Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
As usual Pat Buchanan is correct in his assessment. Pat knows who the real enemy is in this situation. The American people have been played for years at the hand of Israel. Listen to what Pat says. Pat Buchanan: 300 nukes in Israel yet Iran a threat? - YouTube
To bad we didn't get him as president instead we got Clinton for 8 years. I agree with Buchanan on a ton of things just not his social views or religious views. His Foreign Policy is correct though.
gh Isreal has not used one in any comflict and has used comventional wepaons and unlike Iran do not have a a radiccal Regime in charge that woukld use on if they had them and has amejinadad or how ever you spel the nuts name has been saying it for years that they would have no issue using them and as we speak the continue ehruiching yrauim t do just that .
Isreal has every Right to defend it self against prety much the whole ME that wants toom take them out and they have a Country that showed that has no isue to dffight back masive militarys that try to fight them and they have not l.ost yet or used a nulcear weapon after 30+ years of having them.
I would say isreal has proven they can handle Nuclear weapons in a resonsible manor and only u would use them in a Retaliation strike after not a first strike which if Iran nukea Isreal or any other ME country that arms and plots against them then by Isreal has the option to use as much or as little force or as many Nu.cear weapons to strike back under the nuclear of no first use policy gives the right to the country that was attack to strike back without being in violation of any IAEA, U.N. or Start traety of use Nulcear weapons.
Just like India has nukes but they have not used them in any iof the wars they fought with pakistan who atacked India 3 times and got their buts kicked sibabnd india only used conventional wepaons amnd is a secure country that akllso agres to no first ujse MAD doctrine that al major nulcear super power folow thus Isreal amnd India are kind of defacto memebers of the Nulcear Non-poliferation and insuring that rouge natioans like NK and Iran our Radical terriost groups like Hamas our the taliban that have no issues using them do not get their hands on them or produce them to juast to use them as soon as they make them.
Nuclear weapons are what are trying to Reduce major stock piles since they are very expensive to maintain and secure and so far only once have they ever ben used in war which were used to save more lives on both sides and yes we did use them on Japan but it ended WW2 and now it is a Regreatable thing we did and Japan is one of our major friends and allies and major trading partners but at the time it was diffrent and I sory we didi use them since total war is messed up and no one wins in termsxs of the lifes lost on both sides of the alied and axis powers which today we arl trade and get along and .
the ME is only place were the lessons WW1 and WW2, The korean war and Cold war were not learned by all sides involved on how messed up it was and today Total nulcear war ismeans mankind loses and wethat is it no one wins and why after the tsar bomba and castle bravo we all new that send hundreds of weaposns of that mafganitude would mesbe the end of of short run as a species and not sure about you but i want to avoid gojng thew way of the Dinosaurs esp if we can control it from hapening or next thing you know we are oil to another used in what ever species that makes to evolve to repalce us and I do not want to be 87 octane gas at the local chevon or costco gas stations .
1)10000 nuclear heads in US arsenal (7probably the same in Russia's arsenal) and still Iran is a serious threat!
2) Pat Buchanan is antisemite of the worst kind. He wrote that he doesn't understand why the US fought Hitler in WW2. In his opinion Hitler wasn't a threat. Read his book.
1)10000 nuclear heads in US arsenal and still Iran is a serious threat!
2) Pat Buchanan is antisemite of the worst kind. He wrote that he doesn't understand why the US fought Hitler in WW2. In his opinion Hitler wasn't a threat. Read his book.
Hitler posed no threat to us, recognizing that fact does not make one an anti- semite.
Anyone that dares to expose the truth will be branded. Paul Findley was in Congress for 22years and has put forth some revealing disturbing commentary. Of course it will be dismissed by the Israel first traitors in the US.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
