Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 11-26-2012, 07:34 AM
 
Location: Londonderry, NH
41,478 posts, read 59,638,996 times
Reputation: 24860

Advertisements

Where would all of you sage commentators securely invest several billion dollars and achieve a higher rate of return while maintaining the security of Federal Treasury bonds? Is there a secure investment returning 7.5% available anywhere?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 11-26-2012, 07:46 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,288,091 times
Reputation: 27718
Quote:
Originally Posted by GregW View Post
Where would all of you sage commentators securely invest several billion dollars and achieve a higher rate of return while maintaining the security of Federal Treasury bonds? Is there a secure investment returning 7.5% available anywhere?
Nope..Greek bonds is all that comes to my mind but they are rated junk.
Yet pension fund projections still use that high figure as do some private company ones.
Then you get the report of the "actual return" for the past year and it's a fraction of the projection.
Even some 401K company newsletters still use 6% return when projecting.

If they used current figures of 0.50% to 1% you'd see lots of red......
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 11-26-2012, 09:07 AM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,546,330 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by totsuka View Post
I would think some of the states like CA, Il, NY will somehow get a bailout from the feds for this problem.
Except the federal government is out of money and why would the taxpayers have to pay the lavish retirements of these over-paid-in-the-first-place state employees? Let them go on working. They don't need to retire in their 50s and have the US taxpayers working into their 70's to support their lazy selves.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top