Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell said that the real agenda behind the Three Amigos trying to obstruct the appointment is purely an attempt to force President Obama's hand to instead select John Kerry, thereby leaving the Massachusetts senate seat up for grabs, and there's a rethug replacement just waiting in the wings to jump on yet another chance to head back to the senate: none other than Scott Brown, who is attributed to being amenable to just such a scenario taking place.
MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell said that the real agenda behind the Three Amigos trying to obstruct the appointment is purely an attempt to force President Obama's hand to instead select John Kerry, thereby leaving the Massachusetts senate seat up for grabs, and there's a rethug replacement just waiting in the wings to jump on yet another chance to head back to the senate: none other than Scott Brown, who is attributed to being amenable to just such a scenario taking place.
If there's something sneaky, underhanded, creepy or just plain wrong it't easy to find the Republican Thugs hard a works doing it.
But Rice lying to the nation about a terrorist attack - which we now know she did, since she admitted yesterday to having seen the initial CIA report with Al Qaeda references prior to her remarks on television saying they had no evidence it was terrorism - isn't sneaky or underhanded?
Read talking points given her by the CIA on a bunch of Sunday morning shows. That info turned out to be well, less than accurate. GOP senators blow their gaskets in a public display of outrage when it's learned she may be considered as sectretary of state.
Second Rice:
Played a key role in orchestrating the deliberate campaign of disinformation pushed on the public to manufacture support for a bogus middle east oil war in Iraq. When she was nominated for secretary of state, these GOP senators firmly supported that nomination.
It is exactly what the Susan Rice fiasco is all about. Repubs will tell you that Scott Brown voted with the democrats more than the republican agenda and technically, this is true. He's from Mass. for crying out loud, a very liberal state. BUT......if you check his voting record, he voted with the democrats on issues where his yea or nay didn't matter because the vote was stacked for the dems anyway. On issues that mattered and where his vote actually counted, he voted strictly republican party line. He only voted democrat to give the illusion of being a liberal republican in line with his Mass. constituents.
As far as Susan Rice is concerned, she only responded to questions from her press conferences with the talking points she was given. Politically, the Susan Rice political assassination is a blatent attempt by republicans to shoot the messinger.
Why is it that if a republican wakes up with moldy bread in the last four years they immediately blame Obama for anything and everything? But even when the President said, "you want to pick a fight over Benghazi? Pick it with me", the republicans have only targeted Susan Rice? Pure partisan politics of the most deceitful sort. Their attacks are nothing more than a thinly veiled attempt to garner another republican seat in the senate.
I am searching for your post about former president Bush and his interpretation of the true about many things but I am not lucky.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.