Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I used to think so, these days... it is kind of the norm which is why unless a given article properly sources it, I immediately write them off as gossip.
That isn't Climate Change™, it is a process of sublimation and has already been established as such. In fact, Gore (I don't care about gore, but this claim was his flagship for a while) and those who attempted to use it as support had a lot of backlash for it.
Here is the paper that showed what is responsible for the melt with Mt. Kilimanjaro.
Here is a picture that visually explains the process:
Yes it is climate change and yes it is happening at Kilimanjaro, and it is happening at all tropical glacial peaks from the Andes to the Himalayas. Mt. Kilimanjaro isn't the one off situation paid deniers make it.
Yes it is climate change and yes it is happening at Kilimanjaro, and it is happening at all tropical glacial peaks from the Andes to the Himalayas. Mt. Kilimanjaro isn't the one off situation paid deniers make it.
The Atlantic coast of the U.S. has some areas with particularly high rates of sea level change.
"Climate warming does not force sea-level rise at the same rate everywhere. Rather there are spatial variations superimposed on global average rise." The Atlantic seaboard contains "hot spots", areas of faster than average sea level rise, as shown on the following map. The yellow and orange circles indicate hot spots for rising sea-levels based on data from 1950-2009.
The rate of sea-level rise in the atlantic northeast hotspot were 3 to 4 times higher than the global average. The map below on the left is for 1950 to 2009 and on the far right from 1970 to 2009.
I used to think so, these days... it is kind of the norm which is why unless a given article properly sources it, I immediately write them off as gossip.
These findings are not "gossip". They are based on satellite-based measurements --- actual real data, not projections. I posted several links to where you can find actual scientific articles in my posts above.
Actually, Europe and North America are subsiding because the ice age squished Canada down, forcing America to bulge out, now America is subsiding as most of Canada rises, and the North Sea floor is rising while Continental Europe is sinking, it only amounts to a few inches or so, but when your proof is coming from the US, subsidence is a additive factor.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Your paper is a modeled analysis of projections. The one I provided does empirical analysis.
You do understand the problem with your support do you not?
Here is another from Tienshan. Again you are going against almost every piece of data out there. Man made global warming is real. It is almost comical that you are denying it in the face of glacial retreat unseen in ten thousand years.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
