Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 10-15-2007, 11:47 AM
 
2,137 posts, read 3,849,568 times
Reputation: 608

Advertisements

Sorry if this (or I) posted this ? already. Would you Progressives please give us a definition. And...while you are at it, why did you throw the lable Liberal under the bus.

The reason I ask, is that I heard an absolutely silly show on the local Air America network...uh, now they are not AA anymore but Nova? Same problem? But I digress.

The final answer from both of the interviewees was something akin to...stammer, stammer, uh, uh, well just ask the conservatives for the definition of being NOT PROGRESSIVE.

Mind blowing logic.

And no, I'm not kidding. They tap danced like mad. But could not give the definition of a Progressive.

I'd like to hear one.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 10-15-2007, 11:59 AM
 
Location: Your mind
2,935 posts, read 4,989,789 times
Reputation: 604
"Liberal"'s a uniquely American (and non-descriptive) word for the center-left of our political spectrum. In most countries "liberal" implies civil libertarianism, which most American "liberals" want, but also economic libertarianism, which is regarded as more "right wing," maybe...

Maybe people with "liberal" beliefs don't feel as strong as a desire to label themselves as "conservatives" do? I don't know. "Liberal" to me sounds wishy-washy and spineless. Rush Limbaugh and all of his ilk threw the label under the bus by associating it with every evil known to mankind. I prefer "leftist" or "left libertarian," maybe... it sounds cooler and more radical.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2007, 12:02 PM
 
8,425 posts, read 12,139,929 times
Reputation: 4882
I agree. I think conservatives were very successful in making the term "liberal" into a negative epithet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2007, 12:11 PM
 
Location: In an illegal immigrant free part of the country.
2,096 posts, read 1,461,763 times
Reputation: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
I agree. I think conservatives were very successful in making the term "liberal" into a negative epithet.

The liberals didn't need any help from the conservatives to make the term "liberal" into a negative epithet. They were quite able to do that themselves, oops, I forgot "take no personal responsibiltiy"!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2007, 12:13 PM
 
Location: Your mind
2,935 posts, read 4,989,789 times
Reputation: 604
If you say so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2007, 12:16 PM
 
2,137 posts, read 3,849,568 times
Reputation: 608
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
I agree. I think conservatives were very successful in making the term "liberal" into a negative epithet.
How and why?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2007, 12:21 PM
 
6,762 posts, read 11,601,959 times
Reputation: 3028
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
I agree. I think conservatives were very successful in making the term "liberal" into a negative epithet.
yeah, kind of like the left has done with "Evangelical Christians". I've noticed many congregations have started shedding that name because of the constant stereotyping by the left.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2007, 12:21 PM
 
2,137 posts, read 3,849,568 times
Reputation: 608
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishmonger View Post
"Liberal"'s a uniquely American (and non-descriptive) word for the center-left of our political spectrum. In most countries "liberal" implies civil libertarianism, which most American "liberals" want, but also economic libertarianism, which is regarded as more "right wing," maybe...

Maybe people with "liberal" beliefs don't feel as strong as a desire to label themselves as "conservatives" do? I don't know. "Liberal" to me sounds wishy-washy and spineless. Rush Limbaugh and all of his ilk threw the label under the bus by associating it with every evil known to mankind. I prefer "leftist" or "left libertarian," maybe... it sounds cooler and more radical.
Liberal is uniquely American? It is a word. Your post is the same silly stuff I heard on the radio show I spoke of.

I am asking for a definition of Progressive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2007, 12:25 PM
 
Location: Near Manito
20,170 posts, read 24,260,371 times
Reputation: 15285
Quote:
Originally Posted by Manigault View Post
I agree. I think conservatives were very successful in making the term "liberal" into a negative epithet.
As a conservative myself, that is not something of which I am proud. I certainly never participated in the demonization of liberals as people.

That demonization is yet another example of how the radical fringe of a political philosophy hijacked the movement and made it exclusionary instead of inclusionary. It is also why the conservatives now find themselves outnumbered and beleaguered, through the alienation of the moderate majority.

Besides, this country needs liberals in the worst way. Where else would we get all the silly ideas which we conservatives mull over and eventually adopt?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 10-15-2007, 12:30 PM
 
Location: Your mind
2,935 posts, read 4,989,789 times
Reputation: 604
Not a uniquely American WORD, a uniquely American DEFINITION of the word... I mistyped.

Here you go...

Liberalism worldwide - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"In the United States, the primary use of the term liberal is at some variance with European and British usage. In the 19th century it was not a common term in American philosophy or politics, partially because the two main parties were a mixture of populist and nationalist elements. The Democratic Party was the party of free trade, low tariffs and laissez-faire entrepreneurialism, while the Republican Party advocated national citizenship, transparency and government efforts to stabilize the currency. Liberalism in the United States was primarily defined by the self-proclaimed liberal presidents Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Roosevelt. While the emphasis on mutual collaboration through liberal institutions as an alternative to the threat and use of force remained consistent with international liberalism, United States liberals also claimed that individuals have a right to expect the government to guarantee social justice. This was in part a consequence of the influence of the ideas of British economist John Maynard Keynes on Franklin D. Roosevelt's New Deal. The New Deal had the effect of stealing the thunder of social democratic forces and the necessity to prevent social unrest strengthened this development. As McCarthyism gave the terms socialism and even social democracy a meaning synonymous with treason in the U.S., many to the left of center moderated their views, aligning with the New Deal liberals. Since approximately the Reagan era, the word liberal has been so much used as a derogatory term by U.S. conservatives that it led to an ever increasing number of critics of conservatism to identify with progressivism, rather than turning to liberalism. The Democratic Party is identified as the liberal party within the broader definition of liberalism thus putting it in contrast with most other parties listed here. The Libertarian Party, the third largest political party in the United States, though still only getting 1-2% of the vote in congressional elections, particularly centers itself on free markets and individual liberty. The Republican Party generally supports strong free-market and libertarian views on the economy. In general we can say that the Democrats support civil-rights (and therefore social liberalism), the Republicans support free-market (and therefore economic liberalism), while the Libertarians support both."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top