Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So why did the Judge think that the documents (birth certificates) could raise serious questions?
"Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation,....."
unless arpaio has had some double top secret digital document forensics expert working on it he won't be able to submit the "documentation" as part of a proper evidentiary presentation.
“Mclnnish has attached certain documentation to his mandamus petition, which, if presented to the appropriate forum as part of a proper evidentiary presentation, would raise serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates of President Barack Hussein Obama that have been made public.”
".....the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates ...."
the state of hawaii has confirmed the authenticity (backed by the "full faith and credit clause" of the US constitution) of both the "short form"(COLB) and "long form"(LFBC) under two state administrations, one republican and one democrat. all of arpaio's claims are based solely on the PDF of the LFBC made available online. it ignores the fact that the physical certified and confirmed LFBC was released at a press conference (handled and photographed) before being scanned and saved as a PDF. for arpaio's clam to be correct would require that the white house had an official certified LFBC ready to scan but....... made an exact duplicate digitally for sh*ts-n-giggles.
certified physical copies of the COLB and LFBC have also been submitted in court in orly taitz's MS birther challenge.
the state of hawaii has confirmed the authenticity (backed by the "full faith and credit clause" of the US constitution) of both the "short form"(COLB) and "long form"(LFBC) under two state administrations, one republican and one democrat. all of arpaio's claims are based solely on the PDF of the LFBC made available online. it ignores the fact that the physical certified and confirmed LFBC was released at a press conference (handled and photographed) before being scanned and saved as a PDF. for arpaio's clam to be correct would require that the white house had an official certified LFBC ready to scan but....... made an exact duplicate digitally for sh*ts-n-giggles.
certified physical copies of the COLB and LFBC have also been submitted in court in orly taitz's MS birther challenge.
But Judge Tom Parker seems to think that there are serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates. Why does he think that?
But Judge Tom Parker seems to think that there are serious questions about the authenticity of both the ‘short form’ and the ‘long form’ birth certificates. Why does he think that?
ask him. he's either misinformed or he's giving lip service. as i've pointed out, arpaio's "evidence" doesn't meet the standard to be submitted in court and the judge is constitutionally obligated to accept any certified document from the state of hawaii..
call me silly but i would have expected a trained law enforcement officer to have sought out experts that could actually testify in court.
Often noted as the least productive member of the Alabama Supreme Court, Justice Parker somehow found time on Thursday to attach an unprecedented “unpublished concurrence” to the dismissal ordered by a majority of the Justices. In other words, a citizen wouldn’t know it existed unless they knew to ask for it.
“It’s too bad Justice Parker couldn’t find more time to do a little extra light reading,” said Bradley Davidson, Executive Director of the Alabama Democrats. “Given that this is the fourth time a judge from either party has found these ‘serious concerns’ to be a complete waste of the judicial system’s time.”
Often noted as the least productive member of the Alabama Supreme Court, Justice Parker somehow found time on Thursday to attach an unprecedented “unpublished concurrence” to the dismissal ordered by a majority of the Justices. In other words, a citizen wouldn’t know it existed unless they knew to ask for it.
“It’s too bad Justice Parker couldn’t find more time to do a little extra light reading,” said Bradley Davidson, Executive Director of the Alabama Democrats. “Given that this is the fourth time a judge from either party has found these ‘serious concerns’ to be a complete waste of the judicial system’s time.”
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
