Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Oregon is a poorly managed state, I recommend you throw that one out. My assertion is based on averaging of course. But yes, generally red states are better better managed economically than blue states. The tally on January 2013 will be 31 GOP governors and 18 Democratic governors, surely you take issue with this.
You didn't answer my question: Are you saying that Alabama, Lousiana, and Mississippi are managed better?
Point is that people are leaving blue states for red states because they are better managed.
Sources: US Census and pewsocialtrends.org. Creator of map was Mint.com
Please allow me to throw a wrench into your blue/red state thing.
Isn't it a fact that red states have more, or greater numbers of people on welfare, meaning the red states are where most of the slackers are, and oh, yeah, are better managed? If they're better managed, why are the red states not putting those po white and black democratic voters to work.
A week or so ago, one member said that the reason red states got more in welfare $$$$$ was because the red states had more democrat voters (liberal slacker/takers). Wonder why those red states haven't created any jobs for them? because they're democrats?
I guess this blows a hole into the theory that red states are better MANAGED?
Please allow me to throw a wrench into your blue/red state thing.
Isn't it a fact that red states have more, or greater numbers of people on welfare, meaning the red states are where most of the slackers are, and oh, yeah, are better managed? If they're better managed, why are the red states not putting those po white and black democratic voters to work.
A week or so ago, one member said that the reason red states got more in welfare $$$$$ was because the red states had more democrat voters (liberal slacker/takers). Wonder why those red states haven't created any jobs for them? because they're democrats?
I guess this blows a hole into the theory that red states are better MANAGED?
I must have missed the news highlight where blue states were experiencing robust economic and job growth, didn't require bailouts, are gaining population, and were balancing their budgets.
I must have missed the news highlight where blue states were experiencing robust economic and job growth, didn't require bailouts, are gaining population, and were balancing their budgets.
Its a known fact the blue states prop up the red states. the whole NE corridor and California get back pennies on the dollar for money they put into the feds, while red states make bank.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
