Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-12-2012, 03:20 PM
 
Location: The beautiful Garden State
2,734 posts, read 4,150,530 times
Reputation: 3671

Advertisements

All I know is that the day Mittens' comment about the 47% came to light I started dancing and singing. I was so happy! I just knew he had really hurt himself with that comment, and I was right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-12-2012, 03:26 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,462,865 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by nmnita View Post
very good and if anyone thinks what Maureen Dawd says, must be 100% accurate, they need to start seeing and reading the other side.

My opinion: Romney lost not because of any one thing,but several:

He couldn't get his message across
He royally screwed up with his 47%. We all have to realize with today's tech anything you say will be repeated.
He just didn't have the ability to reach the average American. This doesn't mean he isn't giving, caring and doesn't have good ideas, he just doesn't have the communcation skills to get this across. He spent a good part of the campaign on the defensive.

Obama, kissed the you know whats of the gay, by his action on gays in the military and gay marriage: he got the attention of Hispanics by offering his version of the Dream Act: he always had the black support, he got additonal support from single women by forcing insurance companies to offer them totally free controceptives including the morning after pill and he is one heck of a good campaigner plus he is the stiing pres..This in itself probably gave him a 5% advantage. I have never seen any studies done to confirm what advantage a sitting Pres has, but I am guessing it would have to be close to 5%.
I heard one political analyst during the campaign say the incumbent advantage was 7% but he didn't state where or how he arrived at that figure.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:29 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top