Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-23-2014, 08:11 PM
 
45,230 posts, read 26,437,203 times
Reputation: 24979

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by rogead View Post
If you don't want to accept the legitimate definition of the word; speaking as a libertarian socialist, I respect your right to make up your own meanings for words.

Most of the world's libertarians have, historically, been leftists. Most of those in the world today are leftist. Egalitarian collectivists from the political left are, by definition anti-statist--they are libertarians.

Of course, one cannot be a Libertarian (member of The US Libertarian Party) and a leftist, since that political party is largely an ideological stepchild of The US Republican Party.
Leftists and repubs alike just want to co-opt and obfuscate the term as you are doing here.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-23-2014, 08:34 PM
 
Location: Minneapolis
2,526 posts, read 3,051,326 times
Reputation: 4343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank DeForrest View Post
Leftists and repubs alike just want to co-opt and obfuscate the term as you are doing here.
Joseph Dejacque was a French anarchist/communist in the middle of The Nineteenth Century. He is the first person known to have used the term "libertarian" as a designation for his personal political ideology. He even published a paper called The Libertarian. His views were widely adopted by other anti-authoritarian communists and socialists of the era.

It would be another hundred years before those on the political right in The US would utilize the term. Again, libertarianism is a rejection of authoritarianism. It is a position which can be encompassed within a wide variety of economic views.

I'm fine with those of you on the political right who use the term. I even agree with right-libertarians on many anti-statist positions (excessive police presence, domestic spying, The Federal Reserve Banking System, etc.). I just want folks to be educated and honest in using the term "libertarian".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2014, 11:53 AM
 
Location: USA
31,036 posts, read 22,070,533 times
Reputation: 19079
Quote:
Originally Posted by Opin_Yunated View Post
Yes, you can be both.

My official political compass designation is a left leaning social libertarian (lower left quadrant).

I favor highly regulated capitalism, which is the opposite of liberal economics (neoliberalism). However, on social issues, I don't feel the government needs to be involved in such issues (libertarian) as abortion, drugs, and other "moral" legislation.

A true libertarian is little involvement in social and economic issues (bottom right corner).. a left leaning libertarian feels the government should have an active involvement in economic regulation for the well-being of its citizens. Very distinct difference compared to an anarchist-leaning libertarian.
Rep! Someone who understands that further descriptors are needed and not just 'Conservative' and 'Liberal'
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2014, 12:46 PM
 
Location: Phoenix
30,366 posts, read 19,156,062 times
Reputation: 26253
I don't think you can be a Leftist and a Libertarian...Leftists want the Government to control and own everything (people exist for the purposes of the State) while Libertarians want very limited Government where the Govt exists for the purposes of individual (s).

There are areas where Leftists probably agree with Libertarians such as legalizing gay marriage and marijuana and reduced military.

My philosophy is that Gov exists to support the individual (s)...so President Obama works for me to support my interests and I don't work for him.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2014, 12:49 PM
 
Location: A great city, by a Great Lake!
15,896 posts, read 11,987,093 times
Reputation: 7502
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
I don't think you can be a Leftist and a Libertarian...Leftists want the Government to control and own everything (people exist for the purposes of the State) while Libertarians want very limited Government where the Govt exists for the purposes of individual (s).

There are areas where Leftists probably agree with Libertarians such as legalizing gay marriage and marijuana and reduced military.

My philosophy is that Gov exists to support the individual (s)...so President Obama works for me to support my interests and I don't work for him.

That is probably all that we agree on. Though I'm not sure who hates us libertarians the most, the Democrats, or Republicans?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2014, 01:00 PM
 
15,355 posts, read 12,650,100 times
Reputation: 7571
Of course you can be both... just not on CD where being Leftist is considered evil.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2014, 01:14 PM
 
7,846 posts, read 6,404,740 times
Reputation: 4025
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
I don't think you can be a Leftist and a Libertarian...Leftists want the Government to control and own everything (people exist for the purposes of the State) while Libertarians want very limited Government where the Govt exists for the purposes of individual (s).
Yes, and there are different things this applies to. Let's recap:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
There are areas where Leftists probably agree with Libertarians such as legalizing gay marriage and marijuana and reduced military.
Yes, this is called a social libertarian. Little to no government intervention on social issues.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tall Traveler View Post
My philosophy is that Gov exists to support the individual (s)...so President Obama works for me to support my interests and I don't work for him.
Yes, and I believe the government exists to support the economy through regulation of business in the best interests of the people. That is the opposite of classical liberalism (economic liberalism).

Most of the right wing throws out the world "liberal" when they have no idea what it actually means. Liber(tarianism) just means free from government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2014, 05:26 PM
 
Location: SoCal
5,899 posts, read 5,794,657 times
Reputation: 1930
@The OP: It depends on how you define "libertarian" and "leftist".

I myself can be considered both of these things using certain definitions. After all, I strongly support protecting and preserving individual rights, while I also support implementing some left-wing/liberal policies.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2014, 05:32 PM
 
Location: San Diego California
6,795 posts, read 7,288,026 times
Reputation: 5194
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
Of course you can be both... just not on CD where being Leftist is considered evil.
Being a leftist is evil no matter where you are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-24-2014, 05:46 PM
 
Location: the very edge of the continent
89,004 posts, read 44,813,405 times
Reputation: 13701
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feltdesigner View Post
And most high earners live in areas with less violence, a quick police response, gated community, etc.. their taxes pay for better services.
What better services are they getting? Look at what they get in government services and benefits per dollar of local, state, and federal taxes paid, and look at who's getting MUCH more than they pay for:


Sources of data in chart:
The Distribution of Tax and Spending Policies in the United States


(Note to moderators: all images appearing in this post have been linked via HTML text command in a legally permissible manner per the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Perfect 10 v. Amazon ruling, and as such do not constitute copyright violation.)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:46 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top