Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: Should there be an assault rifle ban?
Yes 51 42.15%
No 70 57.85%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,264,475 times
Reputation: 4269

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by squarian View Post
And by a significant increment, since a) law-abiding people will turn them in anyway, b) improved police intelligence - like tracking IPs of people who boast about their "collection" - will locate many of the numbskulls who would try to hang onto them, and c) the remainder of hardened criminals, survivalists and other nutjobs will at least find it harder to trade them about like baseball cards. Of course it won't eliminate them entirely, but a serious police effort can make a much bigger dent than is generally assumed.
I see that many of you progs think combining all those covert methods with the overt laws can get rid of those weapons. Did you read the word retroactive in the report from DF? Maybe you don't know what that word means, but I do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:38 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy View Post
Did Friday's average mass murder buy his rifles?
I'll have to say it again because this is being overlooked a lot, he tried too but was denied because of gun control laws.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:40 PM
 
Location: Pacific NW
9,437 posts, read 7,368,395 times
Reputation: 7979
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
I agree, but to be practical you can't have one without the other. The American perspective varies greatly depending on the groups you speak with...
Which is a great argument for limiting the federal government and letting the states deal with their own problems. We don't need Representatives from Chicago pushing legislation on the entire country based on problems in Chicago. People in Boise or Fargo don't need a gun ban because criminals in Chicago kill each other by the handful every day.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:41 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,264,475 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by padcrasher View Post
Apparently, it hasn't sunk in with you that you gun worshipers lost the last election. And you have no chance again with the changing demographics of ever holding the executive again with the current GOP brand that caters to bitter, old, white, men.

So don't be so sure an assault weapons ban won't be in your future.
Where on the ballot did you see anything about gun bans? Somehow all I saw about gun bans was when progs kept on telling us that Obama hadn't tried in his first four years to get our guns so why should we think he would attempt it. Here he was Friday evening talking about getting something done about guns and is first term isn't over yet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:42 PM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,045,587 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
Let me get this straight. You're saying box cutters are more deadly then guns? Like I said perviously banning guns will not stop violence! What banning guns will do is limit the death toll when violence occurs.
Your proposed gun ban would have helped lower the death toll during 9/11 how?

Quote:
You're saying box cutters are more deadly then guns?
What I'm saying is people are dangerous, the tools they use to commit their acts are just objects.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:42 PM
 
47,525 posts, read 69,692,979 times
Reputation: 22474
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
Let me get this straight. You're saying box cutters are more deadly then guns? Like I said perviously banning guns will not stop violence! What banning guns will do is limit the death toll when violence occurs.
Are you saying box cutters can't be used to slash throats and murder someone? When you're murdered, you're going to be just as dead if they used a knife or a bullet.

Actually guns don't kill people, bullets do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:44 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,049,136 times
Reputation: 10270
Of course she is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:45 PM
 
Location: Unperson Everyman Land
38,642 posts, read 26,374,838 times
Reputation: 12648
Quote:
Originally Posted by AnUnidentifiedMale View Post
And I find that laughable.

Good for her. Even if it doesn't pass, it's good to have the discussion. Hopefully gun lobbyists aren't against simply having a discussion about it.



Congress responds to it's constituents. If the budget is your number one priority, call or email your representative. Most of the rest of the country is more concerned with gun violence right now, I believe.



"Dianne Feinstein as San Francisco mayor, she tried to ban handguns in San Francisco, while she was enjoying the protection of both a police bodyguard and her own concealed carry (CCW) handgun permit."

Untitled Page


"And, I know the sense of helplessness that people feel. I know the urge to arm yourself because that's what I did. I was trained in firearms. I'd walk to the hospital when my husband was sick. I carried a concealed weapon. I made the determination that if somebody was going to try to take me out, I was going to take them with me."

Dianne Feinstein mishandles assault rifle in public


What an incredible tool!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:46 PM
 
Location: The middle of nowhere Arkansas
3,325 posts, read 3,170,019 times
Reputation: 1015
Quote:
Originally Posted by SHABAZZ310 View Post
Here comes the legislation. Do you agree or disagree?



Dianne Feinstein To Introduce Assault Weapons Ban On First Day Of Congress
Well, ot I know, but does this mean we won't have to endure any more of those threads entitled "obama hasn't banned guns yet" by 2nd amendment democrats?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 01:46 PM
 
Location: Southcentral Kansas
44,882 posts, read 33,264,475 times
Reputation: 4269
Quote:
Originally Posted by Finn_Jarber View Post
Nah, these kinds of bills are designed to fail. Next time there is a mass shooting, she will say she tried to stop it in congress, but the GOP wouldn"t let her
You are 100% right on this post about all of it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:09 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top