Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-16-2012, 05:20 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,352,042 times
Reputation: 7990

Advertisements

In recent years there has been a strong trend of police carrying rifles similar to the one used by the mass killer in Connecticut. Some are replacing shotguns with .223 rifles; some are putting rifles in patrol cruisers in addition to shotguns.

We're told ad infinitum by gun control advocates that such rifles have no purpose but to slaughter large numbers of people. That may be in the job description of military, but certainly not police. Police, just like any citizen, are supposed to use guns in a defensive manner, to protect against lethal threats.

So should police be forced to get rid of all the AR's they have acquired?

And further, if these guns are only meant to slaughter, what does that implicitly say about police across the country who have eagerly snapped them up? Gun control proponents, how can you possibly trust a group that feels the need for that kind of weaponry?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-16-2012, 05:21 PM
 
Location: Lost in Texas
9,827 posts, read 6,932,912 times
Reputation: 3416
Not until they can score better at the range... They suck!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 06:07 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,352,042 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by freightshaker View Post
Not until they can score better at the range... They suck!!
Yeah, but that's another issue. In the meantime, I see that not one gun control proponent has taken on the question. I suppose they instinctively know that they're going to end up looking like fools if they do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Clear Lake Area
2,075 posts, read 4,444,931 times
Reputation: 1974
Should we be surprised that police feel the need to arm themselves with AR-15's in response to the nuts out there who started the trend? Why continue carrying a 6 shell shotgun when Jimbo has a 30 shot magazine in his AR-15 and a few extra magazines on his belt?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 06:28 PM
 
26,680 posts, read 28,659,127 times
Reputation: 7943
I absolutely support allowing the police to carry those types of guns.

I also support laws to keep guns out of the hands of people who can't pass a background check or a mental sanity test, and requiring those laws to be followed by gun shows and gun shops throughout the country.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 06:30 PM
 
Location: New Hampshire
4,866 posts, read 5,676,491 times
Reputation: 3786
What I don't understand is how the gun grabbers want civilians to be arms free YET nothing is being mentioned about the abuse by police officers lately....by killing people and even pets and getting away with it... and then asking questions later. Why aren't they talking about that since they want cops and Military to be the only ones armed in this country?! Do they think it is okay for police offers to have that type of behavior just because they are well, police officers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 06:31 PM
 
Location: Old Bellevue, WA
18,782 posts, read 17,352,042 times
Reputation: 7990
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostInHouston View Post
Should we be surprised that police feel the need to arm themselves with AR-15's in response to the nuts out there who started the trend? Why continue carrying a 6 shell shotgun when Jimbo has a 30 shot magazine in his AR-15 and a few extra magazines on his belt?
Why wouldn't the same observation apply to a citizen? When biker gangs, drug gangs, and home invasion crews now have a glock with 17 rounds+1 in the spout, wouldn't it make sense for the home owner to opt for an AR 15 with 30+1 in the spout.?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 06:32 PM
 
4,684 posts, read 4,571,445 times
Reputation: 1588
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
In recent years etc.

Even by the usual standards of strawman arguments on CD, this is utterly, droolingly idiotic. Of course the police should have sufficient fire-power to deal with any reasonably likely threat. The only upper limit is the point where opposition becomes outright rebellion, in which case it's time for the civil power to invoke the riot act and bring in the soldiery. Really, in the rhetorical boxing match around gun control, you just left your guard down and took a KO uppercut.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 06:35 PM
 
Location: New Hampshire
4,866 posts, read 5,676,491 times
Reputation: 3786
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Why wouldn't the same observation apply to a citizen? When biker gangs, drug gangs, and home invasion crews now have a glock with 17 rounds+1 in the spout, wouldn't it make sense for the home owner to opt for an AR 15 with 30+1 in the spout.?

Exactly.

Nah, they want us to be carrying our little .22 around when the thugs break into our homes with their AR 10 A2...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-16-2012, 06:35 PM
 
Location: Everywhere and Nowhere
14,129 posts, read 31,238,974 times
Reputation: 6920
Quote:
Originally Posted by wutitiz View Post
Why wouldn't the same observation apply to a citizen? When biker gangs, drug gangs, and home invasion crews now have a glock with 17 rounds+1 in the spout, wouldn't it make sense for the home owner to opt for an AR 15 with 30+1 in the spout.?
Only if he can accurately use any of those 17 shots before I plaster him against the wall just pointing my Mossberg in his general direction.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:40 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top