Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-19-2012, 09:47 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,350,985 times
Reputation: 40731

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
Actually I would have no problem with Capital punishment for anyone who uses a gun to commit a crime.
Armed robbery, rape, car jacking etc.
I agree, but first we need to streamline the appeals process.

When I was a kid it seems you actually needed a reason to appeal a verdict, i.e. procedural error, prosecutorial misconduct, etc. Now it seems you can appeal for no other reason than you don't like the verdict.

I think we need a system where when there's no doubt of guilt and the trial was conducted according to law, you take the needle, no more 20 year stays on death row.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-19-2012, 09:52 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,023,289 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
I think we need a system where when there's no doubt of guilt and the trial was conducted according to law, you take the needle, no more 20 year stays on death row.
I used to be a firm believer in the death penalty right up until the point where all these people started getting released after DNA evidence was able to prove it wasn't them. I have no problem putting someone to death that has been rightfully found guilty but when you have numerous people on death row that are innocent of the crime they were convicted of you need to take a very long look at whether we should be executing people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 09:57 AM
 
Location: By the sea, by the sea, by the beautiful sea
68,327 posts, read 54,350,985 times
Reputation: 40731
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
I used to be a firm believer in the death penalty right up until the point where all these people started getting released after DNA evidence was able to prove it wasn't them. I have no problem putting someone to death that has been rightfully found guilty but when you have numerous people on death row that are innocent of the crime they were convicted of you need to take a very long look at whether we should be executing people.
By the same token it would seem modern methods give a much higher probabllity of a correct verdict.

I agree with what you're saying but in cases where there's something like a video leaving no doubt of guilt, I have no sympathy.

We just had a murder here in NC where 4 young adults killed a 19 year old college student for sport, a sandwich, and $10. Occurences like this make me wish we'd return to public hangings.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 10:09 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,023,289 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by burdell View Post
By the same token it would seem modern methods give a much higher probabllity of a correct verdict.
It could also be easier to set someone up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 10:10 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,967,439 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
I was just wondering how you folks who own handguns feel about stricter penalties for illegal handguns since I think we can all agree the majority of gun murders in the country are done with illegal weapons.

I was thinking 20 years in prison the first offense W/O the possibility of parole and life in prison the 2nd offense. To me, even gangbangers would not want to take that hit.

This is just for possession of an illegal handgun.
I'm assuming your knee jerk reaction is to the CT shooting. How would penalties against illegal guns have helped with that exactly?

And if "strict penalties" work, we must have a handle on the drug problem in this country, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 10:11 AM
 
25,619 posts, read 36,680,593 times
Reputation: 23295
Death Penalty.

That will stop these tragedies.

I mean hasn't that been working since the dawn of time?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 10:12 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,967,439 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinman01 View Post
Actually I would have no problem with Capital punishment for anyone who uses a gun to commit a crime.
Armed robbery, rape, car jacking etc.
For pete's sake - lefties won't even put murderers to death. What makes you think they'd go for this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 10:13 AM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,967,439 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkatt View Post
Illegal is illegal. Murder is illegal, with severe penalties, and that doesn't seem to stop people, why would changing the penalties on having illegal guns have any bearing on this?
Then the only ones with guns will be criminals. Yea, that's the ticket.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 10:33 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,596,242 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
I was just wondering how you folks who own handguns feel about stricter penalties for illegal handguns since I think we can all agree the majority of gun murders in the country are done with illegal weapons.

I was thinking 20 years in prison the first offense W/O the possibility of parole and life in prison the 2nd offense. To me, even gangbangers would not want to take that hit.

This is just for possession of an illegal handgun.

Name one handgun that is illegal to own?
As the Constitution says, "shall not be infringed upon".

The very fact that any weapon is illegal, is infringement on my individual rights as a citizen of the USA, according to the rights given me as a sovereign citizen of these United States, within the chains on the centralized government, called the US Constitution. The most unique document ever produced for a nation to function freely and with individual liberty.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-19-2012, 10:40 AM
 
46,259 posts, read 27,074,383 times
Reputation: 11113
Quote:
Originally Posted by PullMyFinger View Post
Pretty much no. I wish I didn't have to even think about it to be honest.

This is the problem, there are way to many people who "don't know" who are making decisions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:02 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top