Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: How many kids would it have to save for you to give up your semi auto "assaulte" rifles
I would give them up if it saved one kid 25 29.76%
I would give them up if it saved 5 kids 1 1.19%
I would give them up if it saved 25 kids 1 1.19%
I would not give them up if it cost the lives of 1000 kids. 57 67.86%
Voters: 84. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread Start New Thread
 
Old 12-24-2012, 03:55 PM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,016,029 times
Reputation: 15645

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by hothulamaui View Post
lets get serious, this was a question on a public forum, not anything more or less. do you want pumpkin pie or apple? would you give up your gun to save one child or 1,000. no real qualifiers just a hypothetical question. how many people weaseled and had to add qualifiers to a simple question?

50 people, last time I looked wouldn't give up a gun to save 1,000 children. pathetic and selfish. I would give up my gun for the life of one child no question asked.

to save the life of 1,000 children I would walk or take the bus for the rest of my life without question
Like I've said before, silly hypothetical questions require the same kind of answer. Not selfish or pathetic (you don't know me so unless you're channeling Kreskin you'll not be able to tell anything from a poll answer).
You know what I've noticed? Has anyone seen a ideological bent to the posts where names are being called?
Can we have a discussion without calling names?

 
Old 12-24-2012, 04:03 PM
 
Location: LEAVING CD
22,974 posts, read 27,016,029 times
Reputation: 15645
Quote:
Originally Posted by tamajane View Post
This is why people are not taking your poll seriously, it is an attack question. We could all do something heroic to save another but in reality, we seldom do. Police, firefighters, military, they do, but normal schmucks do not take efforts to save people even though in truth we could. You are only asking one group of people to give up something to save the children. What can non-gun owners do to save some kids?
Pray that the guys in blue that have 'em show up, then wail about lawsuits or how racist (or both) they were when they're not fast enough.
 
Old 12-24-2012, 04:07 PM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,168,625 times
Reputation: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by itlltickleurinnerds View Post
first off the question is an Ethical Dilemma, not a question about certain guns or calibers. You guys are like the person at the Psychologists office who is shown ink blots and keeps saying they see two people having sex and when the Psychologist says you have a lot of sex on your mind they say your the one with the dirty pictures. LOL Its just gone over your head.
I flunked the ink blot test, all I saw were ink blots.

BTW, I am an engineer.

An optimist see's a cup half full,

A pessimist see's a cup half empty,

An Engineer see's a cup 2 times larger than it's required to be.

Last edited by Darkatt; 12-24-2012 at 04:17 PM..
 
Old 12-24-2012, 04:12 PM
 
Location: Va. Beach
6,391 posts, read 5,168,625 times
Reputation: 2283
Quote:
Originally Posted by plates View Post
It was first made for the military. Educate yourself.

Stop playing semantics.
No, the M-16 was made for the Military, the AR15 was a semiautomatic version made for the general public.

Educate yourself.
 
Old 12-24-2012, 06:09 PM
 
Location: Earth
4,505 posts, read 6,483,735 times
Reputation: 4962
^^^ Has that HAPPENED...please post a link to that news story!


...Or is this another straw example you nuts cook up with emotions instead of facts?


Tell me how an ex-con murderer in gun-free new York managed to kill firefighters after committing arson and setting a trap for them?

GUN FREE NEW YORK...how? I mean, if guns are BANNED and arson is illegal, murder is illegal and an ex-con in possession of firearms is illegal...HOW? Why didn't the LAWS prevent all of this?


Answer: LAWS do nothing on their own....what STOPPED this guy? A GUN in the hands of the good guy.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Closed Thread


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:55 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top