Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Call them all people killers. For that is what they are.. If you want to wipe out an entire classroom of small children what do you need? A people killer. Sure you could get them with a 12 gauge or a Glock...more work and less likely to be lethal.
Do you make this stuff up on your own?
When the truth doesn't serve his agenda, what else can he do?
Of course, he could try telling the truth. But being a liberal, his agenda is much more vital than that, so the truth is ignored out of hand.
Call them all people killers. For that is what they are.. If you want to wipe out an entire classroom of small children what do you need? A people killer. Sure you could get them with a 12 gauge or a Glock...more work and less likely to be lethal.
However a true proponent of the 2nd would demand the right to explosives. They certainly are arms in the classical sense of the word.
It is simply that most of the 2nd advocates have actually sold out the ability to influence or overthrow the government so as to protect their gun hobby.
However a true proponent of the 2nd would demand the right to explosives. They certainly are arms in the classical sense of the word.
It is simply that most of the 2nd advocates have actually sold out the ability to influence or overthrow the government so as to protect their gun hobby.
The thing is....I could kill you with a fork...a ink pen....just about anything.
Inefficiently and ineffectively. And forks and ink pens have regular uses of importance and for which they exists.
There are a class of weapons that are suited primarily for killing people and lack any overriding use. These people killers ought to be called people killers. I have no objections to someone arguing that people killers are a good thing as it is necessary to be well prepared to kill people quickly and in volume.
Inefficiently and ineffectively. And forks and ink pens have regular uses of importance and for which they exists.
There are a class of weapons that are suited primarily for killing people and lack any overriding use. These people killers ought to be called people killers. I have no objections to someone arguing that people killers are a good thing as it is necessary to be well prepared to kill people quickly and in volume.
But they still should be called people killers.
What about the ones I have that have killed deer, caribou, moose, bear and coyotes????
Inefficiently and ineffectively. And forks and ink pens have regular uses of importance and for which they exists.
There are a class of weapons that are suited primarily for killing people and lack any overriding use. These people killers ought to be called people killers. I have no objections to someone arguing that people killers are a good thing as it is necessary to be well prepared to kill people quickly and in volume.
But they still should be called people killers.
It doesn't work very well when you make up your own terms without actually defining what they mean.
For all I can tell your talking about the flu.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
