Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:33 PM
 
3,620 posts, read 3,833,729 times
Reputation: 1512

Advertisements

nothing about clip size or assault weapons. all they want is more and more and more and more guns.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:35 PM
 
7,359 posts, read 5,460,493 times
Reputation: 3142
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtc08 View Post
nothing about clip size or assault weapons. all they want is more and more and more and more guns.
There's nothing to give. The right of the people shall not be infringed is what it says. It doesn't say it shall only be infringed a little bit. It says shall not be infringed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:40 PM
 
Location: Clear Lake Area
2,075 posts, read 4,444,931 times
Reputation: 1974
So you're ok with the elimination of all laws related to guns and weapons? All weapons of war should be fully available to the civilian populace? Convicts, mentally unstable, children should all freely be able to walk in and buy shoulder fired rocket launchers?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:41 PM
 
27,307 posts, read 16,210,815 times
Reputation: 12102
Quote:
Originally Posted by LostInHouston View Post
So you're ok with the elimination of all laws related to guns and weapons? All weapons of war should be fully available to the civilian populace?
Damn right. I want my bazooka. I already have my fifty cal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:41 PM
 
23,838 posts, read 23,112,280 times
Reputation: 9409
I'll give up high capacity magazines. While I hope that there's never a mass shooting again, I know that a competent shooter will not be deterred by fewer rounds in one magazine. It literally takes less than 3 seconds to discharge, re-insert, and rechamber a round. If banning high capacity magazines are the token gesture that makes anti-gunners happy, then so be it. It won't stop or prevent anything, though.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:43 PM
 
Location: Sinking in the Great Salt Lake
13,138 posts, read 22,804,086 times
Reputation: 14116
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtc08 View Post
nothing about clip size or assault weapons. all they want is more and more and more and more guns.
This is all I want:


Braveheart - Freedom - YouTube

Stop tying to give our freedom away.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:45 PM
 
2,083 posts, read 1,619,891 times
Reputation: 1406
Assault weapons is a vague term that is used to inspire fear in anti-gun nuts. It inspires scary images of fully-automatic machine guns with belt-fed magazines. Clip size is irrelevant, as if it takes much time to reload when there is no armed or threatening opposition.

This is about our 2nd amendment rights being threatened, because it won't end. Ban semi-automatic rifles and shotguns and someone will go on a shooting rampage with handguns instead. Then the calls for banning handguns will start to pour in. At what point do we draw the line? At what point will anti-gun proponents be satisfied? When we're back to using 6 shot revolvers? When there are no guns available to the public at all?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:45 PM
 
17,400 posts, read 11,966,236 times
Reputation: 16152
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtc08 View Post
nothing about clip size or assault weapons. all they want is more and more and more and more guns.
And I won't give anything on free speech, freedom of religion, etc.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:48 PM
 
2,677 posts, read 2,615,635 times
Reputation: 1491
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtc08 View Post
nothing about clip size or assault weapons. all they want is more and more and more and more guns.
Which of the following weapons is an assault weapon?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-21-2012, 12:49 PM
 
Location: Clear Lake Area
2,075 posts, read 4,444,931 times
Reputation: 1974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vejadu View Post
Clip size is irrelevant, as if it takes much time to reload when there is no armed or threatening opposition.
Arizona shooter got off 30 rounds in 30 seconds and was then tackled during a magazine change. So I'd say magazine size is entirely relevant as the difference between 10 round being fired and 30 could have certainly saved some lives.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:56 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top