Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 12-24-2012, 01:31 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,782,576 times
Reputation: 4174

Advertisements

Dems and Republicans keep staging these huge "battles" over a few pennies in tax increases. But we don't have a taxing problem. We are taxed plenty enough.

We have a spending problem. The govt spends incredibly huge amounts, and makes promises that amount to even more.

Yet I haven't seen a single proposal to spend less next year than we did this year. Every proposal I've seen, says we will spend even more than we did before, in every government department. Some say that instead of increasing 15% like we had planned to, we'll "only" increase 10% instead. (Some of the sillier politicians and newscasters, on both sides, refer to this as a "cut". That's like saying that instead of chopping off three of your fingers as I had planned to do, I'll only chop off two of them. There, I've increased your number of fingers by one!)

Is there ANY politician, in any party, proposing to actually CUT spending? It's what we desperately need.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 12-24-2012, 01:35 PM
 
Location: Rational World Park
4,991 posts, read 4,504,794 times
Reputation: 2375
No party ever proposes real spending cuts because no constitiuency wants any cuts. At some point we have to look at ourselves and stop blaming elected officials. Dems want no cuts but will at least agree to tax increases. Pubs want no cuts, no tax increases and want to hold the debt limit hostage and refuse to pay for stuff they (congress) already bought.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 01:43 PM
 
Location: Dallas, TX
31,767 posts, read 28,815,462 times
Reputation: 12341
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little-Acorn View Post
Dems and Republicans keep staging these huge "battles" over a few pennies in tax increases. But we don't have a taxing problem. We are taxed plenty enough.

We have a spending problem. The govt spends incredibly huge amounts, and makes promises that amount to even more.

Yet I haven't seen a single proposal to spend less next year than we did this year. Every proposal I've seen, says we will spend even more than we did before, in every government department. Some say that instead of increasing 15% like we had planned to, we'll "only" increase 10% instead. (Some of the sillier politicians and newscasters, on both sides, refer to this as a "cut". That's like saying that instead of chopping off three of your fingers as I had planned to do, I'll only chop off two of them. There, I've increased your number of fingers by one!)

Is there ANY politician, in any party, proposing to actually CUT spending? It's what we desperately need.
Well, here's proof that your memory isn't very good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 04:57 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,581 posts, read 9,782,576 times
Reputation: 4174
Quote:
Originally Posted by EinsteinsGhost View Post
Obama himself cut $700 billion from Medicare (that is, he reduced the amount they were going to spend... but did he reduce it by the amount of increase they had planned?)

...only to transfer that $700B to Obamacare and spend it anyway.

In other words, government spending DIDN't go down. It was just transferred from one govt program to another, and spent anyway.

Anybody else?

Last edited by Little-Acorn; 12-24-2012 at 05:51 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-24-2012, 05:31 PM
 
48,502 posts, read 96,848,488 times
Reputation: 18304
yep and the only program he has volunteeer to sut agin i these negoiations is agin medicare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 01:23 AM
 
22,661 posts, read 24,594,911 times
Reputation: 20339
NOPE, no cuts....so sorry!

More insanity from the creeps who are supposedly in charge....they are supposed to make the hard decisions.........to be leaders.................LMFAO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 08:26 AM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,546,008 times
Reputation: 1951
If America REALLY wanted spending cuts then they would have voted for Dr. Ron Paul.

You reap what you sow.

End of story.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 08:29 AM
 
Location: My beloved Bluegrass
20,126 posts, read 16,157,110 times
Reputation: 28335
Lots of liberals want to cut defense spending and have proposed as much. But they just want to transfer it so they can spend it on other programs. Not a true cut.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 12-25-2012, 08:45 AM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,417,223 times
Reputation: 4190
Santa was going to bring Jonny a fire truck and a BB gun. Jonny was excited. But the elves were getting tired and there were simply too many kids.

Santa and Mrs Clause were having a cup of coffee and Mrs Clause suggested that if he put a few more kids on his naughty list he wouldn't have to work so hard. Santa thought about it, but he was worried because he'd already promised Johnny a truck and.a BB gun.

Mrs Clause suggested that he work the elves overtime this year and start the naughty list next year. Santa thought about it and decided he could do it. All year he added more and more kids to his naughty list. The elves were happy. But the kids got wind of things and things went south. He cranked up production mid year.

The head elf asked was going on. He saw that Jonny was getting another fire truck and another BB gun. Santa explained that he had actually planned to give him a truck, a BB gun, and a GI Joe, so it was technically a cut. He could take the extra GI Joe and give it to little Joe. The elf pointed out that Jonny hadn't asked for a GI Joe and Joe was on the naughty list anyway. Santa reminded him who was in charge and threatened to outsource toy production to China.

The elf scratched his head in disbelief and decided that Santa was as crazy as his old uncle down in the states, his Uncle Sam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:49 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top