Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
I have been married to the same man for 48 years and won't be dating anyone but if I were to date and found out someone was into baby murdering that would certainly be a deal breaker for me. I could never have any respect for someone that did that for a living.
It seems that the pro-death crowd subtly like to switch up words to make things sound more acceptable, such as in your sentence, you said a woman's 'body' when it's actually not their body, but rather a child that is inside their body. Hints the word abort. Why would you have to 'abort' something that isn't living? That would make no sense as far as when you define what the word abort means.
Oh please. You say "pro death". How emotive.
I'm sorry but it is that womans body. A living human is far, far more important than a theoretical one, morally.
Children are capable of breathing on their own. They have developed limbs, brains, nervous systems. They even make noise, cry, move around, and need food and clean nappies. They can survive outside the womb and this ability only occurs after the old fashioned "quickening" at around 20 weeks when traditionally, the soul is supposed to enter the fetus and it becomes a viable life.
In the early stages, an unwanted pregnancy (zygote) is literally a parasite. A collection of cells rapidly multiplying like a cancer and feeding off an unwilling host.
Imagine yourself with a tumour that makes you violently ill, that is growing daily but your doctor is refusing to operate, forcing you to keep it in your body until it is big enough to burst out on its own, just because he has more interest in the tumor than he does his patient.
When the pro life lobby has experienced that, then they can broadcast an opinion on abortion. Until then, they really don't know wtf they are talking about so should probably keep it to themselves.
^ I wouldn't quite call the fetus - NOT zygote - a 'theoretical human being.' They even look like tiny human beings.
They also look like baby elephants. And baby chimpanzees.
I love kids. I have 3 of them. Still doesn't give a baby that's unable to survive without a host (the mother) more rights than the host (the woman who is pregnant).
I'd love it if men could get pregnant. The amount of crow being eaten would be phenomenal.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
What would you expect them to look like? Baby dinosaurs?
They kinda do until their tails fall off.
__________________
When in doubt, check it out: FAQ
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
