Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No one denies that Sasha and Malia deserve all the protection that they have.
What people question is why the loony left wants to deny that same protection to people like the 20 first graders and 6 teachers and faculty who were murdered in Newtown.
President Obama wants action in the wake of this tragedy. How come he isn't insisting on the same level of protection afforded his children?
If you want more protection for YOUR KIDS go to YOUR LOCAL SCHOOL BOARD and raise the issue.
Are YOU and the people in YOUR SCHOOL DISTRICT WILLING TO PAY HIGHER TAXES FOR MORE SECURITY AT YOUR LOCAL SCHOOL?
The issue of more security at schools doesn't have a damn thing to do with how much security President Obama or his children receive.
Where was it stated that the "loony left" wants to deny protection to schoolchildren? When was the vote? What bill was denied? When did all of this happen?
Ask the loony left - who disparages the NRA's approach and wishes to ban weapons rather then seek solutions that prevent unstable people from carrying out massacres.
If you want more protection for YOUR KIDS go to YOUR LOCAL SCHOOL BOARD and raise the issue.
Are YOU and the people in YOUR SCHOOL DISTRICT WILLING TO PAY HIGHER TAXES FOR MORE SECURITY AT YOUR LOCAL SCHOOL?
The issue of more security at schools doesn't have a damn thing to do with how much security President Obama or his children receive.
More school districts would likely do just that if President Obama used his influence to advocate for such an approach, rather than calling for a ban on all guns.
What people question is why the loony left wants to deny that same protection to people like the 20 first graders and 6 teachers and faculty who were murdered in Newtown.
President Obama wants action in the wake of this tragedy. How come he isn't insisting on the same level of protection afforded his children?
This school has one highly trained armed guard for every 102 students.
Do the math.
Also, the taxpayers paid for Jenna to go bar-hopping in Mexico.
So quit with your phony outrage. We all know the reason why you constantly post these trolling threads and nobody is buying it. Get over the black man with the silly name being YOUR PRESIDENT. I didn't vote for him either, but I'm not complaining about something that has happened under every single president since nutjobs like you started making threats on the lives of the presidents and their families.
I never said that I want the federal government to pay for security at the schools, did I?
Nice strawman.
You are correct that I call for a local government solution, although allowing faculty to carry concealed would be a much better approach.
All I ask of President Obama is to put his mouth where his money is, and advocate for local governments to either fund security at schools, or not obstruct faculty who wish to carry concealed.
Your smear attempt FAILS.
So you want the Federal Government to tell the Local Government what to do?
More school districts would likely do just that if President Obama used his influence to advocate for such an approach, rather than calling for a ban on all guns.
When did Obama call for a ban on all guns?
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
They say, Do what I tell u to do, not what I do."
