Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
No the problem is that you want everyone to see things from your point of view. We don't. While it is an issue that he had access to those guns, it is a very minor issue compared to what actually caused him to want to use those guns in that manner. Deal with the mental illness and criminal mentality of the perpetrators to address crimes like this. Don't do it by blaming the inanimate object that was used.
That Adam Lanza had access to guns, and ammunition, is a major issue. But then, that people like you want to cover it up, IS why I suggested some are simply incapable of learning from these tragedies.
That's how liberals are -- the almightiy aristocrats are more worthy because they have money. It's all about money to thel liberals.
Like it or not -- Obama's kids are no better than anyone else's kids. Just much richer, much more privileged.
Wow, that sounds like an answer that came from a bi-polar brain. Which is is? Liberals are all welfare queens or are they all about being an aristocrat with privileges?
They are the president's daughters smh, of course they will have more protection than regular civilian kids just like the president travels with an entourage and a bariage of security intel. Guess if you are considered important and have the money you would do the same thing for your family smh
Let's see, teachers can get plastic surgery on the tax payers dime, but not sufficient security for the schools? Yeah, teachers are really in it for the children...NOT!
You conservatives are funny. You are here arguing that the elitist class should have no extra benefits beyond what you have available to yourself but on the other hand you complain all the time on this board when you think your tax dollars are helping the poor to something you think they should work for or do without. If you want to protect your child in the manner of a president's children then seek out a private school that meets your those standards and pay for it with your own money.
I am also seeing that same sentiment. We need more of this and that, but don't take my guns, and we should have equal treatment that the higher end has. I wonder who will pay for this treatment if no one likes "shelling" out their hard-earned money for food stamps, section 8, and other welfare programs that the feel everyone on the list is abusing the system and are lazy good for nothings. Hmmmm
Too bad the children of Newtown aren't the sons and daughters of the liberal elite. Perhaps then liberals would give a darn about them.
BINGO! EXACTEMUNDO!! YA GOT IT!! Sad but true, if you aren't considered privileged you ain't [MOD CUT/profanity] A horrible truth no one likes to look at, we think we are separated by "race" but race was invented, we're separated by society status. When you aren't a part of high society, no one really gives a care unless something happened on a large scale or if someone wants to make some type of statement with your death or negative experience somewhere.
Obviously Obama doesn't want guns banned for the elite as he considers himself to be -- or he'd have SS agents that are unarmed. And obviously he wants his aristocratic children protected by guns -- but that's because he's a filthy rich man who believes his money and power entitle him to what the little people cannot have.
Pretty rotten to expect he should be entitled to what the peons cannot have--- and that is sel-defense and protection.
Did you say the same of all other previous Presidents?
Did you say the same when the SS guarded the Romney and Ryann families?
Of all the Presidential hopefuls, Romney was the one and only who inacted state law banning AR-15 weapons and did so in 2004. He also defended that action during his campaign.
Let's see, teachers can get plastic surgery on the tax payers dime, but not sufficient security for the schools? Yeah, teachers are really in it for the children...NOT!
They are the president's daughters smh, of course they will have more protection than regular civilian kids just like the president travels with an entourage and a bariage of security intel. Guess if you are considered important and have the money you would do the same thing for your family smh
"smh"?
I'm "smh" because you can't seem to fathom that yes, in this magical place the rest of us inhabit called "the real world," presidents and heads of states are targets EVERY DAY OF THEIR LIVES and NEED heavily armed security to protect themselves from other nutters with guns.
If they were private citizens, or even lower level government, they are NOT valuable targets to terrorists, foreign governments and other assorted crazies.
I don't understand the call in this country to become even MORE armed! Have you travelled to foreign countries where armed guards stand on the streets and in front of private homes? I feel LESS safe in those places, not MORE safe! Why the desire to live like they do in 3rd world banana republics? Murder IS down to decades lows, you know, yet the calls for increased arming of the public ramps up despite that FACT.
smh
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.