Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:16 PM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,544,156 times
Reputation: 1951

Advertisements

Congratulations, liberals...you've (for all intents and purposes) destroyed America.

CBO: 'Fiscal cliff' deal carries $4 trillion price tag over next decade - The Hill's On The Money

Quote:
The Senate deal to avoid the "fiscal cliff" will add roughly $4 trillion to the deficit when compared to current law, according to new numbers from the Congressional Budget Office (CBO).
...and where is King Obama?

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:18 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,766,243 times
Reputation: 6856
I guess we shouldn't cut taxes then. That would cut a bunch of debt.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:20 PM
 
Location: Baldock, hertfordshire, England
768 posts, read 879,564 times
Reputation: 254
In reality, Politicians are idiots. Even if they balanced the books they'd just invest any surplus in Worthless IOU's from Greece or somewhere like the Germans did.

Salvation is in eliminating ALL politicians.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:23 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,543 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6029
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
Congratulations, liberals...you've (for all intents and purposes) destroyed America.

CBO: 'Fiscal cliff' deal carries $4 trillion price tag over next decade - The Hill's On The Money

...and where is King Obama?
You realize that the current tax plan is that ALL the Bush tax cuts expire and the 400 billion(600 billion in some estimates) cuts in budgetary spending happen.

so yes, any bill to CUT TAXES and CONTINUE SPENDING is going to product higher deficits and lower revenue than one that does the opposite.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:24 PM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,544,156 times
Reputation: 1951
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
I guess we shouldn't cut taxes then. That would cut a bunch of debt.
How about just closing all of the loopholes and cutting a mere 1% per year on ALL line items for the next 20 years.

This is the best idea so far for balancing our budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:24 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,543 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6029
Quote:
Originally Posted by LAWS View Post
In reality, Politicians are idiots. Even if they balanced the books they'd just invest any surplus in Worthless IOU's from Greece or somewhere like the Germans did.

Salvation is in eliminating ALL politicians.
you cant have a surplus in a balanced budget.

a surplus in and of it self is considered bad accounting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:24 PM
 
7,214 posts, read 9,390,397 times
Reputation: 7803
That number is lower than it would be if the current Bush tax cuts were continued. So your thread premise is a fail.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:26 PM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,544,156 times
Reputation: 1951
Quote:
Originally Posted by dsjj251 View Post
You realize that the current tax plan is that ALL the Bush tax cuts expire and the 400 billion(600 billion in some estimates) cuts in budgetary spending happen.

so yes, any bill to CUT TAXES and CONTINUE SPENDING is going to product higher deficits and lower revenue than one that does the opposite.
All we need is a 1:1 compromise on revenues:

If democrats want $3 trillion in new government programs then we cut $3 trillion from existing government programs to pay for it.

Who can be against this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:26 PM
Status: "everybody getting reported now.." (set 17 days ago)
 
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,543 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6029
Quote:
Originally Posted by clb10 View Post
How about just closing all of the loopholes and cutting a mere 1% per year on ALL line items for the next 20 years.

This is the best idea so far for balancing our budget.
The plans i have seen like that dont balance the budget till like 2030.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-01-2013, 01:27 PM
 
Location: North America
5,960 posts, read 5,544,156 times
Reputation: 1951
Quote:
Originally Posted by MaseMan View Post
That number is lower than it would be if the current Bush tax cuts were continued. So your thread premise is a fail.
What are you talking about?

The so-called "Bush tax cuts" expired at 11:59:59 PM last night.

By the way Bush hasn't been in office since January 2009.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:57 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top