Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:20 AM
 
7,473 posts, read 4,015,652 times
Reputation: 6462

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Why is it legitimate?
End all tax loopholes and entitlements.


To include your government pension???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:22 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,279,876 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by riaelise View Post
Yes, I'm aware that over a certain income, the benefit is reduced (Ours definitely will be this year). But still. The way I look at it, if others have write offs, why not us?
So, it's strictly greed and entitlement.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:24 AM
 
7,473 posts, read 4,015,652 times
Reputation: 6462
Quote:
Originally Posted by hoffdano View Post
You haven't given a single reason this tax credit should exist. Why should you pay lower income taxes because you chose to have children?

because those children will be there to help take care of their parents when they are older and need help.The sorry ass people with no children will be supported by the government which those children pay Their taxes to.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,448 posts, read 15,478,210 times
Reputation: 18992
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
So, it's strictly greed and entitlement.
Yeah, what you said
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:27 AM
 
24,488 posts, read 41,138,516 times
Reputation: 12920
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffdoorgunner View Post
because those children will be there to help take care of their parents when they are older and need help.The sorry ass people with no children will be supported by the government which those children pay Their taxes to.
There's no correlation between being child-less and relying on the government in retirement years. The sorry-ass people are the ones who live unproductive lives and are not able to set aside a nice nestegg to live off of. But it has nothing to do with having children or not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:29 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
Well the IRS is not doing a good job of "qualifying" these credits taken.
They estimate $4 billion has gone out in fraudulent refunds.
They've taken action against the obvious ones ($65,000 in child tax credit refunds to a single address) but admit there are problems because they don't require the child's SS be put on the form.

But don't worry..they are "looking into it".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:34 AM
 
7,214 posts, read 9,393,969 times
Reputation: 7803
The child tax credit was a Newt Gingrich idea. Thank him for it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:38 AM
 
Location: Earth
24,620 posts, read 28,279,876 times
Reputation: 11416
Quote:
Originally Posted by riaelise View Post
Ok, whoa there pardner. What does my honesty have to do with anything? You don't like my position, then fine. Doesn't really matter to me. But my honesty - my integrity - has nothing to do with this argument and really doesn't apply here.

As for my 'breeding' choices, I'm not a dog. I don't 'breed'. I'm not about to go into the whole "child-less" vs. "parents" circular argument here. It's just something that is a genuine waste of time and quite frankly, at some point in time I will be without dependents, and then we will join the rank and file who so-called pay for others as well. My taxes pay for a variety of people and things...there's not one person here who can be any more indignant than anyone else.

I was without children and now I have children. The point I was making in that post is that regardless of the deduction, I would have had my children anyway. But I feel no shame in taking the deduction, neither do I feel that it should be taken away unless ALL deductions are taken away, regardless of whatever it is. And if you take the deductions away (which hell, should also include the standard deduction), then there'd better be a good solution -- as in lowering the tax rate or that flat tax. I could agree on that.
Yes, it wasn't just your position - it was your comments that were dishonest - when you get a special tax credit, others pay for that.
You have what, 2 or 3 kids, that $18k per kid minimum. That's $36-48k you get on the backs of other taxpayers.
Times everyone else who chooses to breed at the taxpayer expense.
And yes, breeding is the proper term; sorry you don't like definitions.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:43 AM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,537,397 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeffdoorgunner View Post
because those children will be there to help take care of their parents when they are older and need help.The sorry ass people with no children will be supported by the government which those children pay Their taxes to.
LOL tell my kids that.

Trust me, it doesn't work that way.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:59 AM
 
Location: Round Rock, Texas
13,448 posts, read 15,478,210 times
Reputation: 18992
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
Yes, it wasn't just your position - it was your comments that were dishonest - when you get a special tax credit, others pay for that.
You have what, 2 or 3 kids, that $18k per kid minimum. That's $36-48k you get on the backs of other taxpayers.
Times everyone else who chooses to breed at the taxpayer expense.
And yes, breeding is the proper term; sorry you don't like definitions.
Neither my position nor my comments reflected any dishonesty on my part. As for the 36,000 that I am supposed to be getting, that's news to me. It sure as heck isn't reflected on our tax return. I don't get any windfall checks in April. If you personally take no deductions whatsoever, then you can lecture me about whatever deductions that I take.

I know what the definition of "breeding" is. Breeding is usually a term used for non-humans. Or it's a derogatory, contemptuous term used by others to denigrate those who choose to become parents. In any event, if that makes the person feel good saying it, so be it. Whatever.

Like i said, I'm not getting into this circular breeder/childfree debate. it is what it is. there are things my taxes pay/have paid that I don't like..no one is special.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:33 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top