Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-03-2013, 06:30 PM
 
Location: USA
5,738 posts, read 5,443,536 times
Reputation: 3669

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
Let me educate you.

Yes, we want to protect the money of the insanely rich, but NOT for their sake, for the economy's sake. YOu see, as long as they have it, it will be invested to make the economy grow, to make real progress and good things happen.

If you tax it away from the economy and down the black-hole of wastefull government, it is wasted, squandered.

Now you know the rest of the story.
"it will be invested to make the economy grow", this line is complete BS. Through a long chain of money exchanges, their money may create jobs, and that's it. However much of their cash goes to homes and vacations in other countries, who knows? The continued growth of our economy is also entirely dependent on education, new technology, and other infrastructure, and I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for rich people to band together to, say, build a bridge to improve the flow of trade. Someone has to do it, and that is the job of the federal and state governments.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-03-2013, 06:48 PM
 
Location: Central Texas
13,714 posts, read 31,176,487 times
Reputation: 9270
Everyone should be certain that any aggressive move to extract wealth from the mega-rich will cause a nearly instant move of wealth outside the US - to any place that taxes the money less. These people are THE BEST positioned to protect themselves.

As for Gates - I am completely confident that his foundation will allocate his billions more efficiently and effectively than the federal government. His foundation is also handling $1B of Buffett's money per year.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 07:43 PM
 
20,948 posts, read 19,051,128 times
Reputation: 10270
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
The nerve of the government to tax people, what kind of government taxes their own people. Seriously, name one country besides the US that has the nerve to tax its citizens??!! You can't!
Taxation is legal dum dum.

Taking wealth is not.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:06 PM
 
Location: Palo Alto
12,149 posts, read 8,418,303 times
Reputation: 4190
Quote:
Originally Posted by gwynedd1 View Post
No it isn't. Most of their money is from government forced monopoly and legalized confiscation.
Microsoft? Oracle? Dell? The Walton family? The Lego inventor? Red Bull? Amazon.com?


Those are some of the billionaire families. Can't recall ever being forced to buy their products. Or shop at Wal-Mart.

Buffett owns a string of unrelated companies. I haven't bought a Coke in years other than occasionally at a game. He buys companies that attract everyday consumers.

One of the newest billionaires is the guy who founded a store for people too cheap to shop at Wal-Mart. The Dollar store segment is growing.

I found an article profiling some of the billionaire families. If you look at how they started, almost all were "a guy with an idea who took some risk and started with a few dollars" stories.

That's what makes America great - the last country in the world where anyone with an idea can pitch his tent of wares and grow a business. What's hurting us is massive regulation and taxation of small business, the real engine of the economy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:12 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by southward bound View Post
Isn't it their property?? Someone living in a shanty town would think you are insanely rich (maybe you actually are), but it's all relative. At what point does one's property become subject to confiscation for redistribution?



There's a difference between taxation and the taking of one's property to pass out to others. Note that the French court ruled excesss taxation as unfair:

In a stinging rebuke to one of Socialist Hollande’s flagship campaign promises, the constitutional council ruled Saturday that the way the highly contentious tax was designed was unconstitutional. It was intended to hit incomes over €1 million ($1.32 million).

How is taxing a select segment of our citizens different?
There is nothing excessive about our taxation, it is the lowest it has ever been in history.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:13 PM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,180,801 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by alphamale View Post
Taxation is legal dum dum.

Taking wealth is not.
So tax everyone but the wealthy because if we tax them it is considered "taking?"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:15 PM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,070,826 times
Reputation: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler View Post


Personally, I'm worried about those offshore banks like in the Bahamas and Cayman Islands. And what about those Swiss banks with their secret, numbered accounts? What will become of THEM if there's no more billionaires stashing all their money away from the scrutiny of the IRS? I can't sleep at night for worry over the whole thing.

Maybe the EPA could declare billionaires an endangered species or something?

I'm aready giving them all those payroll taxes that I paid for more than 30 years of hard work that were supposed to go toward my social security pension. I don't know what else I can do to help. Maybe one of them needs a minimum wage housekeeper or something, since I can no longer afford to retire. Do you think?

Pfffft! You guys are too much! Somebody should inform you that America doesn't require its people to be serfs for the sake of a few corrupt noblemen who happen to have the King's ear. That would have been England around 1213. This is the United States in 2013 and I am not required to grovel before wealth. No one else is either. If you guys want to, feel free. But don't expect the rest of us to scuffle along with you.
When you attempt to be so cavelier, you only damage your cred.

Now scamper back to Make Some Sense for a Change 101.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:16 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,740,494 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by janelle144 View Post
Obama is giving a lot of money back to the billionaires that got him re-elected. What do you think the spending is all about? He is repaying a lot of rich people.
Yep. He gave his millionaire Hollywood buddies some exemptions in the new tax increase bill.

Obama: the poster child for Crony Capitalism. If you are his buddy, you don't have to worry about tax increases.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:17 PM
 
3,740 posts, read 3,070,826 times
Reputation: 895
Quote:
Originally Posted by It'sAutomatic View Post
"it will be invested to make the economy grow", this line is complete BS. Through a long chain of money exchanges, their money may create jobs, and that's it. However much of their cash goes to homes and vacations in other countries, who knows? The continued growth of our economy is also entirely dependent on education, new technology, and other infrastructure, and I wouldn't hold your breath waiting for rich people to band together to, say, build a bridge to improve the flow of trade. Someone has to do it, and that is the job of the federal and state governments.
Enough of the mindless drivel. Get a clue. I think they have them in Aisle 2 and your local convenience store.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-03-2013, 08:21 PM
 
Location: In the Redwoods
30,353 posts, read 51,942,966 times
Reputation: 23746
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Actually the funny thing about this thread, California has some of the highest taxes in the country, yet they also have some of the highest amounts of billionaires living in their country. I am pretty sure the rule is, if you can afford it, then you can live there.
Yep! One of these California Billionaires is actually an old family friend (went to middle-high school with his daughter, and she's a close friend of my sister). Last I checked the father is worth $1.4B, all SELF-MADE through real estate investments & development.

Funny thing is, they live fairly "simply" considering, and kinda look like schlubs - seriously, if I showed their photo on this forum, the right leaners would probably call them welfare bums or white trash! They also happen to be the nicest people ever, and donate millions to charities and non-profit organizations annually. I'm sure they pay more than their fair share in taxes too, and probably wouldn't complain if they had to give a little more. That being said, I'm the last person to support taking more than 50-60% of anyone's income... in fact, I would support a flat tax if the rates were fair across the board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:20 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top