Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Its simple I don't tell you what to do with your womb and you don't tell me what guns I can own. How about that?
I won't tell you your killing a child and you don't tell me my gun is a child killer, how about that for a truce?
Only from the twisted logic of a Conservative. Unless it is a partial birth abortion, the standard qualification of what is considered an abortion is NOT the "killing of a child". I think even you would agree that there isn't any such ambiguity about what a bullet through the head constitutes... ... moreover, when that bullet can travel the length of a city block or more and bury itself in random noggins of strangers minding their own business, I think We The People have a right to tell you how to police your management of your killing technology. When and if, it ever becomes possible to spontaneously induce an abortion in a total stranger from 1000 yards you might have a valid negotiating point. As it stands: FAIL!
Better still, how about legitimizing marriage for BOTH sexual orientations, and you can ALL keep your guns (with certain restraining orders)? "Live and let live."
I have never cared who can get married to whoever. doesnt matter to me if you want to get married to whomever.
Only from the twisted logic of a Conservative. Unless it is a partial birth abortion, the standard qualification of what is considered an abortion is NOT the "killing of a child". I think even you would agree that there isn't any such ambiguity about what a bullet through the head constitutes... ... moreover, when that bullet can travel the length of a city block or more and bury itself in random noggins of strangers minding their own business, I think We The People have a right to tell you how to police your management of your killing technology. When and if, it ever becomes possible to spontaneously induce an abortion in a total stranger from 1000 yards you might have a valid negotiating point. As it stands: FAIL!
H
Well either way your not going to get any new laws passed. So suck on that. I am not a Conservative either. I am very liberal on gay rights, womens rights, Social Security and health care. I voted for Obama and want a national health care system. But I don't believe in gun bans. Next My gun rights are spelled out in the Constitution your rights are not. So if anyone fails its you and your logic. You ain't getting no new gun laws.
The worst part is that this isn't the first 'gun v abortion' post I've seen. I don't know if it's the same poster or if there are more of them that don't have a clue that there is nothing logical or creative about it.
The worst part is that this isn't the first 'gun v abortion' post I've seen. I don't know if it's the same poster or if there are more of them that don't have a clue that there is nothing logical or creative about it.
It is logical.
Many of those who cry bloody murder at the mere mention of having their gun rights restricted in any way......are the same people who are clamoring to have a woman's reproductive rights restricted.
Government interference........ bad for me...... good for you.....is hypocracy at its finest.
I woman friend of mine when asked to comment on gun control responded with, "use two hands."
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.