Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-13-2013, 12:17 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape View Post
The question put to the Supreme Court in the case of The Lost Ark, was, "is this guy a citizen"?
So far, so good.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape
The United States Supreme Court ruled that because his alien parents birthed him on U.S. soil, he ws a citizen of the United States. (Just of American soil, but not of American soul).
And since the US Constitution recognizes only two classes of citizen (natural-born and naturalized) that makes him a natural-born US citizen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape
The question as to whether he was a natural born citizen per constitutional qualification for the presidency was not asked, and rightfully therefore, not answered.
Actually it was answered. If you do not think so, read Justice Fuller's dissent. He points out explicitly that the majority decision made Wong eligible for the US Presidency. And he was no more happy about than you are. He just didn't try to deny the truth.

Wong Kim Ark remains to this day the only SCOTUS decision that has ever been cited as precedent in any subsequent case regarding the definition of natural-born citizen.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape
Dicta is just that, DICTA.
Too bad that the Wong definition is not dicta, then. The conclusion that Wong Kim Ark was a citizen at birth could not be reached without the definition of natural-born citizen settled on by Justice Gray. Therefore it is not dicta at all. It is ratio decidendi. To whit:

Anyone born on US soil who is not the child of a foreign diplomat or an alien army in hostile occupation is a natural-born US citizen.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-13-2013, 12:18 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape View Post
Tribal identity is determined by language spoken.
Wrong yet again.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2013, 12:20 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,075,809 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape View Post
Fraud on the court taints everything it touches.
That comment is so breathtakingly dumb, I think I'll just let it sit there.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2013, 12:46 PM
 
26,563 posts, read 14,441,941 times
Reputation: 7431
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
If it is true it will be one of the greatest scandals in history.
yes it would.

for all aspects of birtherism to be correct requires a conspiracy that involves hundreds of thousands of people, all branches of US government and military, multiple foreign governments and dates back hundreds of years.

another possibility is that the birthers are wrong.

Quote:
I don't know what the effects would be as far as if Romney would become President or if Biden would and what it would do to the various executive orders and laws he has signed into effect.
in this hypothetical scenario obama would still need to be impeached by congress, biden would assume the presidency and all executive orders would remain valid under the de facto officer doctrine ( there is no "runner-up" clause in the US constitution for romney ).

Quote:
But even if everything remained in place and Biden replaced him, it would still be an epic even in history.
yep. but it's not so it isn't.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2013, 12:51 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
ratio decidendi
Aren't you mister smarty pants with the big Latin phrases.

...couldn't rep you again so you will have to settle for this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2013, 02:14 PM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,763 times
Reputation: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by HistorianDude View Post
So far, so good.


And since the US Constitution recognizes only two classes of citizen (natural-born and naturalized) that makes him a natural-born US citizen.

Actually it was answered. If you do not think so, read Justice Fuller's dissent. He points out explicitly that the majority decision made Wong eligible for the US Presidency. And he was no more happy about than you are. He just didn't try to deny the truth.

Wong Kim Ark remains to this day the only SCOTUS decision that has ever been cited as precedent in any subsequent case regarding the definition of natural-born citizen.

Too bad that the Wong definition is not dicta, then. The conclusion that Wong Kim Ark was a citizen at birth could not be reached without the definition of natural-born citizen settled on by Justice Gray. Therefore it is not dicta at all. It is ratio decidendi. To whit:

Anyone born on US soil who is not the child of a foreign diplomat or an alien army in hostile occupation is a natural-born US citizen.
So far, so good.

And since the US Constitution recognizes only two classes of citizen (natural-born and naturalized) that makes him a natural-born US citizen.

You're fabricating atop constitutional fabric, in fact, embroidering


Actually it was answered. If you do not think so, read Justice Fuller's dissent. He points out explicitly that the majority decision made Wong eligible for the US Presidency. And he was no more happy about than you are. He just didn't try to deny the truth.

He was wrong, evidenced by the fact he was unable to keep himself to the the question presented to the Court.

Wong Kim Ark remains to this day the only SCOTUS decision that has ever been cited as precedent in any subsequent case regarding the definition of natural-born citizen.

And it, as are you, are FULL of dicta.

Too bad that the Wong definition is not dicta, then. The conclusion that Wong Kim Ark was a citizen at birth could not be reached without the definition of natural-born citizen settled on by Justice Gray. Therefore it is not dicta at all. It is ratio decidendi. To whit:

Sua sponte, pulled out of his butt.

Anyone born on US soil who is not the child of a foreign diplomat or an alien army in hostile occupation is a natural-born US citizen.

Native born, not needing naturalization.

Mince meat pie is fine, but one should never mince or mix words.

You seem to be attempting to make hamburger out of the U.S. Constitution.

No one's going to buy it.

Not even Hamilton Burger.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zH-3vsNmgWQ
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2013, 02:27 PM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,763 times
Reputation: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Thank you Chief Justice Ape.

You are basing this on your own bias and certainly nothing in the law.
Logic encompasses the law.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2013, 02:29 PM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,763 times
Reputation: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Emeraldmaiden View Post
Orly Taitz is Hitler????
Some say so.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2013, 02:32 PM
 
26,563 posts, read 14,441,941 times
Reputation: 7431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape View Post
No one's going to buy it.
the "2 US citizen parents" theory has lost in court 13times now and neither romney, mccain or clinton embraced it during their respective campaigns so....... obviously somebody is buying it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-13-2013, 02:33 PM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,763 times
Reputation: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by wrecking ball View Post
nope.

nowhere in vattel's original writings translates to "natural born citizen". the first time the phrase is used in a translation of vattel is 10years after the ratification of the US constitution and long after vattel's death.
The Framers were multi-lingual, and well educated.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:02 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top