Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-15-2013, 07:14 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,258,614 times
Reputation: 3444

Advertisements

^Americans don't learn from history, unfortunately...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-15-2013, 08:20 PM
 
Location: NC
9,984 posts, read 10,389,353 times
Reputation: 3086
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mircea View Post
I don't particularly care for the CATO institute, but the Congressional Research Service has some nice reports on it.

Some guy at Ohio State did a study showing the optimal Capital Gains Tax Rate is 9.69%.

Lowering the rate below 9.69% does not increase Capital Gains revenues, but increasing the rate above 10% results in lost revenues for government.

There's another thread on Capital Gains Tax rates, and if I remember what I said, just doing a ball-park estimate, the US lost about $3 TRILLION to $5 TRILLION in tax revenues from the time Bush the Elder raised the rate until Bush the Younger lowered it again.

Oh, another, the CBO report from October 2002 on Capital Gains and Federal Revenues.

Honestly, I'm just stupefied.

The data is all right there, plain as day for everyone to see. Raise the Capital Gains Tax rate and you lose federal tax revenues; lower the rate, and revenues increase. How stupid are those people?




That would all be very fascinating if it was even remotely relevant.



Wages were flat.









None of you even understands the arguments.

By raising the rate, you just lost $200 Billion to $300 Billion in revenues annually -- and what will that do for the budget deficit? No change, or the deficit increases, which means the National Debt increases.

This phenomenon is not limited to the US. It has been observed in every country that utilizes a Capital Gains Tax.

Even the damn Italians are smart enough to set the rate at 12.5%.

This is the right answer here...



Capitally...

Mircea
Oh look another post by Mircea who can only respond to arguements by editing them to say Blah blah blah.

It is a GOP myth to say you lose revunue by raising rates. Clinton should have dispelled that with the Omnibus Budget reconcilation act of 1993, but the right seems to cling to their bad economics like a religious zealot.

The answer should be obvious from the fact that the highest rates are in the healthest economies of Northern Europe, Germany is kicking everyone's ass and subsiding all of Europe with a rate of 25% and the Nordic states, where the economy is strong, have even higher rates.

It is the flagging economies that can never seem to raise enough revenue like Greece, or the tax havens, that have the low rates

Last edited by Randomstudent; 01-15-2013 at 08:28 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-15-2013, 10:37 PM
 
Location: Orlando
8,276 posts, read 12,855,535 times
Reputation: 4142
I'm writing a contract for a guy that bought some land at a tax sale for $235,000 cash. My contract is for $2,000,000 He was concerned his tax rate was rising. Here are the numbers

2,000,000 - $235,000 = 1,765,000 taxed at 15% = 264,750

taxed at 23.8% = 420,070 for a difference of $155,320

So the poor thing is going to profit only $1,344,930 or 572% I just don't know how he will make ends meet.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 07:44 AM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,201,228 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
Increasing the dividend rate is an incentive for a one time cash payout, because of the rate change. However after that it becomes more difficult to get money out of a C corp. Thus there is a higher incentive to re-invest rather then pay dividends. On the other hand with low dividend rates people want to take as much out of the company as humanly possible particularly if they suspect dividend rates are subject to increase. In fact the best thing you can do to encourage long term investment is have a super high dividend tax and stepped up basis.

Ireland and Bermuda do have corporate entities, but only because there is no serious tax legislation or enforcement to deal with tax havens.

Additionally, the net revenue always increased generally except for 2000-2007, but if you adjust for inflation population growth and the business cycle it increased at a slower rate with reduced taxes.

Reagan and revenue - NYTimes.com
I am confused, are you agreeing or disagreeing with the fact that we should lower the tax rate in an effort to bring in additional revenue? It has been proven that raising capital gains tax rates decreases investing, and decreases tax revenue.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Roadking2003 View Post
Correct, and they always consider taxes when deciding where to invest or where to locate operations. It's interesting that some countries have ZERO tax on capital gains.
And I also assume that someone such as randomstudent has no idea what a double irish double dutch sandwich is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 10:13 AM
 
2,861 posts, read 3,849,160 times
Reputation: 2351
Quote:
Originally Posted by Toyman at Jewel Lake View Post
I say let the rates increase. If conservatives are correct, we will see investors pull their money from businesses, stocks and investments. In which case, the national economy will continue to tank, or even accelerate into the crapper. If liberals are right, the economy will be unaffected and the government will have greater revenue.Run the experiment and see what happens once and for all. If the economy craps, it will be an education for the American voter...one they sorely need.
Wishful thinking...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 10:48 AM
 
9,855 posts, read 15,201,228 times
Reputation: 5481
Quote:
Originally Posted by AONE View Post
I'm writing a contract for a guy that bought some land at a tax sale for $235,000 cash. My contract is for $2,000,000 He was concerned his tax rate was rising. Here are the numbers

2,000,000 - $235,000 = 1,765,000 taxed at 15% = 264,750

taxed at 23.8% = 420,070 for a difference of $155,320

So the poor thing is going to profit only $1,344,930 or 572% I just don't know how he will make ends meet.
What does whether or not he can make ends meet have anything to do with what is a fair tax rate?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-16-2013, 03:44 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,731,520 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomstudent View Post
The answer should be obvious from the fact that the highest rates are in the healthest economies of Northern Europe, Germany is kicking everyone's ass and subsiding all of Europe with a rate of 25% and the Nordic states, where the economy is strong, have even higher rates.

It is the flagging economies that can never seem to raise enough revenue like Greece, or the tax havens, that have the low rates
So are all of these zero capital gains tax countries "flagging economies?"

Belgium 0%
Luxemburg 0%
Netherlands 0%
South Korea 0%
Switzerland 0%
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top