NRA’s New Ad Calls Obama ‘Elitist Hypocrite’ (weapons, minutemen, solutions)

[Colorado Rambler]

Being just a tad disingenuous here, are we?

For anyone else who may not be a master of the obvious:

The POTUS and his family are very high profile and all kinds of nut cases (oh no - not here on THIS forum) find the idea of harming or killing them quite attractive. However, these same nutcases have not homed in on regular Americans and their families who aren't featured on the daily news. If an average American gets shot by a seccestionist with a Bushmaster, the victim just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I can walk down the streets of my town any time I please and will be perfectly safe. However, Michele Obama can't.

Duh, are we all clear on that now?

Now you guys can return to doing something REALLY important like making wild claims about Obama's birth certificate.

[RebelYell14]

Originally Posted by chielgirl

And I call the NRA a bunch of idiots.

What's the difference?
The NRA means nothing, and their opinion means even less.
They pander to fearful, insecure idiots.

Yer talking about Obama supporters there not NRA supporters...read it slowly let it sit on the brain for a minute....there ya go.

[emcee squared]

Originally Posted by chielgirl

And I call the NRA a bunch of idiots.

What's the difference?
The NRA means nothing, and their opinion means even less.
They pander to fearful, insecure idiots.

I couldn't have said it better.

[swbtoo]

Originally Posted by emcee squared

I couldn't have said it better.

Anybody could have said it better. At least without the name calling it would have some semblance of thoughtful opinion and credibility.

Liberals don't seem to feel confident expressing themselves without the name-calling.

[Mr.XXX]

Gee, I'm hurt.
Seriously, a bunch of wackaloon's opinions are supposed to hurt me?

Just from your reaction...I think it does...

[e_coli]

Originally Posted by Mashed Potatoes

I guess all of those people are fearful paranoid freaks, right antigunners?

Yeah, I would agree with that, actually.

[e_coli]

Originally Posted by southward bound

Anybody could have said it better. At least without the name calling it would have some semblance of thoughtful opinion and credibility.

Liberals don't seem to feel confident expressing themselves without the name-calling.

Honestly, the name calling probably feels a bit cathartic.

[cecilsav]

Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler

Being just a tad disingenuous here, are we?

For anyone else who may not be a master of the obvious:

The POTUS and his family are very high profile and all kinds of nut cases (oh no - not here on THIS forum) find the idea of harming or killing them quite attractive. However, these same nutcases have not homed in on regular Americans and their families who aren't featured on the daily news. If an average American gets shot by a seccestionist with a Bushmaster, the victim just happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.

I can walk down the streets of my town any time I please and will be perfectly safe. Hpwever, Michele Obama can't.

Duh, are we all clear on that now?

Now you guys can return to doing something REALLY important like making wild claims about Obama's birth certificate.

Bravo!!

[momonkey]

Originally Posted by middle-aged mom

Did you happen to notice the quikie "who said" quiz at the bottom of the article?

Gun-Control Quotes: Obama, Feinstein, or Reagan? -- Daily Intelligencer

Since all three of the options are politicians, the Second Amendment exists to keep all three of them in check without prejudice.

The Founders clearly had Feinstein and Obama in mind when they wrote and ratified the Bill of Rights, but they also had Reagan in mind.

[jojajn]

Originally Posted by Mr.XXX

Is that AD dead on...

NRA’s new ad calls Obama ‘elitist hypocrite’

Is the NRA a group of idiots? What happens to national security if the presidents daughters were to be kidnapped?

The NRA is hurting their own cause!