Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
View Poll Results: What guns would you ban
All guns, No one needs a gun at all 5 11.63%
Ban all semi auto guns hand gun and rifle keep your revolver and shotgun 4 9.30%
Only the guns that look like modern military guns 2 4.65%
No gun ban. Its not the guns its the culture. 32 74.42%
Voters: 43. You may not vote on this poll

Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2013, 02:50 PM
 
20,458 posts, read 12,378,099 times
Reputation: 10251

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by itlltickleurinnerds View Post
Would you ban all guns as the NRA says, or just military assault rifles? What if there were shootings with shot guns, are they now killing machines?
Military assault rifles are already banned. they have been banned since the 1930s.

We still have some guns that are made to LOOK like military weapons but they are a far cry from it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2013, 02:52 PM
 
Location: Dallas
31,290 posts, read 20,735,123 times
Reputation: 9325
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartanguy View Post
.Even if it's not 40% and I want do more research on this. Why should anyone be able to get a firearm without a criminal background check?
Because background checks are useless. Only an absolute idiot criminal would submit to a background check. Even really dumb criminals know that and will find other ways (theft) to get guns.
Quote:
This is the most basic way to ensure that ALL sales are to those who can legally own them and hold them accountable for what happens to that firearm.
No, it's just more government overhead for law abiding citizens.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 02:57 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,561,042 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spartanguy View Post
.
I can have the discussion on the merit of the background check only when the government demostrates it's willingness enforce the current law.

The really giant loophole is the 80,000 a year unprosecuted criminals. That is 80,000 criminals who should be in prison.

Do that and then we talk.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 03:15 PM
 
5,705 posts, read 3,670,574 times
Reputation: 3907
How about their thumb and index finger in the shape of a gun?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 03:26 PM
 
Location: Orlando
8,276 posts, read 12,857,391 times
Reputation: 4142
So if it's the culture, and you know guns don't do it any favors you still think they should be there?

Seems like throwing dynamite in a burning building.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 04:09 PM
 
Location: Prepperland
19,021 posts, read 14,198,297 times
Reputation: 16745
What use is an "assault weapon" or a large capacity magazine or "scary features"?

In Federalist Paper #46, 1788, James Madison argued that Americans should not fear the “federal” government to be established under the new compact constitution. He argued that since the American people are armed, unlike other nations whose governments fear an armed populace, no federal army led by an ambitious leader could defeat the States and their stalwart militiamen, who would outnumber and outgun any standing army.

OOOPS. Now we see the hidden agenda to diminish the rights of the people to bear "scary guns".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 04:58 PM
 
26,694 posts, read 14,561,042 times
Reputation: 8094
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ferd View Post
Military assault rifles are already banned. they have been banned since the 1930s.

We still have some guns that are made to LOOK like military weapons but they are a far cry from it.

Some would argue the difference is splitting hair. I can't see the $20,000 difference in price and the legal hoops that we have to jump through is splitting hair.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 05:00 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,194,933 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoJiveMan View Post
Americans do not own assault rifles.

real assault rifles, or rifles that look different than a semi automatic hunting rifle?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 05:03 PM
 
3,345 posts, read 3,074,284 times
Reputation: 1725
Looks like the people have spoken..... the culture is the problem..... clearly
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:06 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top