Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:33 PM
 
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
744 posts, read 1,091,965 times
Reputation: 871

Advertisements

Hear that sound? It's conservative loons' heads exploding! LOL!

Panetta opens combat roles to women | Fox News
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:35 PM
 
691 posts, read 771,565 times
Reputation: 286
Just in time for Sasha and Malia to sign up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:37 PM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,159,362 times
Reputation: 178
Would women soldiers be more likely to be captured than shot by the enemy?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:37 PM
 
Location: Southern California
15,080 posts, read 20,479,858 times
Reputation: 10343
I have no problem with this.

[welcome to the 21st century]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:38 PM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,266,597 times
Reputation: 3444
Will women get to enjoy the privilege of signing up for selective service?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:39 PM
 
691 posts, read 771,565 times
Reputation: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape View Post
Would women soldiers be more likely to be captured than shot by the enemy?

They will be captured and raped and then sold into slavery. The videos will be posted on the internet for everyone to see.

We don't need a thousand Jessica Lynch stories on TV every night.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:39 PM
 
Location: Frankfurt, Germany
744 posts, read 1,091,965 times
Reputation: 871
Wow. First Obama ends the war in Iraq, then kills Bin Laden, allows gays in the military, and now women in combat!

I think conservatives are going to be signing up for Glenn Beck's utopian compound in droves soon. Let's just hope they drink the grape-flavored kool-aid.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:42 PM
 
691 posts, read 771,565 times
Reputation: 286
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
Will women get to enjoy the privilege of signing up for selective service?

I wonder if they will be able to hide in the rear with the gear to get combat pay or ALL women will be required to be on the front line? No more joining the military "for the free education".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:42 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,060,237 times
Reputation: 15038
Nothing like approving something that has been fact on the ground for more than a decade.


New Roles in Iraq
As the conflict in Iraq has evolved, new roles for women have emerged. While their roles as support troops may be officially defined as defensive, women are fighting back when their convoys come under attack. In addition, the combination of a guerrilla insurgency and the Muslim restrictions on male-female interaction has necessitated that female soldiers be attached to combat units. Some women, like the Lionesses, perform door-to-door patrols and work directly with the infantry.

Observers both in and outside the military agree that the combat exclusion policy, with its attendant collocation restriction, is incompatible with the nature of the war that U.S. forces are currently engaged in, as well as any future conflict they are likely to be committed to in the foreseeable future. As one Army report pointed out, “The nature of the current battlefield makes it impossible to apply strictly the existing rules for excluding women from combat without serious reduction in combat capabilities, degrading the professional development and thus status of women and producing a potentially serious reduction in overall readiness.”

http://www.pbs.org/independentlens/lioness/combat.html
In Afghanistan and Iraq, the U.S. military has fought wars unlike any in American history. Neither war has had clear front lines — meaning that anywhere can turn into a combat zone.

And that means that women, who officially don’t have combat roles, have been battle-tested — few more so than Chief Warrant Officer Stephanie Rose.

Rose was among the first women to fly the Apache attack helicopter, and she is currently serving her third combat tour, this one in northern Afghanistan.
Female Pilot Reflects On War And Evolving Army : NPR
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-23-2013, 01:42 PM
 
2,539 posts, read 4,088,153 times
Reputation: 999
Now women that turn 18 years of age will have register for selective service. A court had ruled that since they didn't serve in combat they didn't have to register. Well everything changes.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:19 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top