Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 01-24-2013, 10:47 AM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,044,020 times
Reputation: 2874

Advertisements

No seriously.

An exerpt:

Quote:
Originally Posted by The link
A Republican lawmaker in New Mexico introduced a bill on Wednesday that would legally require victims of rape to carry their pregnancies to term in order to use the fetus as evidence for a sexual assault trial.
House Bill 206, introduced by state Rep. Cathrynn Brown (R), would charge a rape victim who ended her pregnancy with a third-degree felony for "tampering with evidence."
“Tampering with evidence shall include procuring or facilitating an abortion, or compelling or coercing another to obtain an abortion, of a fetus that is the result of criminal sexual penetration or incest with the intent to destroy evidence of the crime," the bill says.
Here's a link to the actual bill before people freak out over "FOMG HUFFPO THIS CAN'T BE TRUE CAUSE OF BIASED LINKSSSSSSSS":


http://www.nmlegis.gov/Sessions/13%20Regular/bills/house/HB0206.pdf

Essentially, trying to make abortion illegal not because of personhood, but because of evidence tampering.

Creative, but still disgusting.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:02 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,214,810 times
Reputation: 35013
The latest tactic, from what I gathered last night on another thread, is going for the "women are being forced to have abortions" and a slew of new rules and regs will be introduced to "protect" them. I mean, if we can shut down clinics because of doorway widths and whatnot then it's not a stretch to turn every women into a victim who needs protecting...from herself.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:06 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Abortion stops a learning brain.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:11 PM
 
Location: North Carolina
2,072 posts, read 1,756,162 times
Reputation: 437
I am pretty sure they can get DNA from the baby before she gets an abortion...one of very few cases where baby murder should be legal.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:13 PM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,230,341 times
Reputation: 2857
That's a pretty dumb lawmaker. The first workaround I can think of that makes her "concern" about evidence moot is that investigators could procure fetal tissue from the products of conception at the time of the abortion. The DNA would be the same as if the fetus were carried to term.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:14 PM
 
5,391 posts, read 7,230,341 times
Reputation: 2857
^^See - it's a very obvious idea that renders the legislator's bill pointless.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:15 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
The pro-abortion people will claim that this woman lawmaker "hates women".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:15 PM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,048,770 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
Abortion stops a learning brain.
Apparently there are other causes that stop brains from functioning as this law attests.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:16 PM
 
Location: Los Angeles County, CA
29,094 posts, read 26,008,825 times
Reputation: 6128
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Apparently there are other causes that stop brains from functioning as this law attests.
You read the entire text of the law that quickly?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 01-24-2013, 12:20 PM
 
Location: California
37,135 posts, read 42,214,810 times
Reputation: 35013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Harrier View Post
The pro-abortion people will claim that this woman lawmaker "hates women".
She "hates abortion and the woman who have them" yes. It's pretty obvious. Not to you? REALLY?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:24 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top