Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-03-2013, 12:30 PM
 
17,815 posts, read 25,574,545 times
Reputation: 36267

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by jackmccullough View Post
So their mistake was that they weren't smart enough to put one past a genius like you. Thanks for being on the job!

Well that beats being a dummy and not questioning anything.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-04-2013, 04:46 AM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,235,101 times
Reputation: 16665
Quote:
Originally Posted by GuyNTexas View Post
As always ... crack analysis. But, I don't think the government has a "resources" issue ... it seem to have plenty of resources to do whatever it wants. This is about simple observation which apparently not very many people do, so from that perspective, there were plenty enough actors necessary to create what looks realistic to most of the dull witted, unwashed masses. In that respect, they had plenty of "actors".
This makes no sense to me. (And please spare the personal attacks. Nothing wrong with expressing confusion, ok?)

Why wouldn't the government just hire enough actors so it looked really real?

You know, if you want your points to be taken seriously, you should show a modicum of respect for the people you are addressing. Calling people names and acting in an abrasive manner only makes one look desperate instead of confident in their stance.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 04:48 AM
 
28,164 posts, read 25,235,101 times
Reputation: 16665
Quote:
Originally Posted by seain dublin View Post
Well that beats being a dummy and not questioning anything.
That's the only two choices, obviously:

Sucker<----------------------------------------------------------------------------->THE GOVERNMENT DID IT!


No in between, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-04-2013, 09:31 AM
 
4,739 posts, read 4,425,591 times
Reputation: 2485
What I find interesting, is the absurdity of it. The desperation to believe in something that makes the crazy or mundane scripted?

the threshold.

What is more believable - a lone crazy person or a well financed secret government organization, or even the entire government? I mean these shootings have been happening at this rate for the last 30 years or so. Sandy Hook, etc, aren't that unusual in the scheme of things. Just a continued trend. As far as shootings go the victums is slightly abnormal, but not so much so to cause me to go "impossible". The guy in Norway was just as bad.

The cherry picking - People just search hard to find something that looks a little odd, then run hay. A tackled man in parking lot? ask questions? A hunter? thats odd. People leaving one building and going in another, wow!

The news media - they are the worst. They are idiots. . .remember Supreme Court on healthcare reform? Graphics up showing overturned for minutes. . .but its misinformation due to the fact they suck. They are 24x7 first is all that matters. You post what you see as "discrepancies' and what I see is just more proof that old media is dead, long live inaccuracies.

and finally, the reason - How many people would it take to fake something like sandy hook. So many believers, not one snitch. Not one person who records a meeting with his smartphone and leaks to youtube? or wikileaks? So lets say they can put it together, WHY?

To influence public op. against guns? Really? that is the reason. if I was an absloute power president who could formulate a conspiracy like this. . .you would just start seeing random deaths of your supreme court justices. .some in the 4th year. They are the ones who stand between gun rights and legislation. They can easily, with a majority, swing back gun control to a state issue (full bans allowed).

The idea that even a shooting like sandy hook would influence the debate enough to overcome the sheer power of the NRA lobby, the gun rights activists, etc is just. . .foolish.

So finally - - Why isn't there a conspiracy. . .simple, not enough juice in the squeeze.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-16-2013, 01:25 PM
 
33 posts, read 49,230 times
Reputation: 27
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don9 View Post
Two videos from the Sandy Hook shooting day. The first one is the raw HD footage from a helicopter above the Sandy Hook firehouse. Watch the people closely and you will realize they are walking in a circle from the back part of the firehouse to the front and then out the back again ... and they keep circling. If you look closely you see the same people over and over again. This was noticed recently and the 2nd video is the same video edited with music added.


Sandy Hook News Chopper Helicopter - Crystal Clear - HD and Zooms - YouTube

Walking in Circles Around Sandy Hook Firehouse - Creating The Illusion of More People - YouTube
This video was recorded from a helicopter. Likely it was done by a surveillance team in a drill. They have a purpose to release this tape. To increase the confusion of suspicious people. (by the description of "walking in circle" with music and editting of the tape.)

The point you should know is that: 1. for this case they activated a lot of informants. 2. They make a record in process. 3. From records they select piece to meddle the water.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:41 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top