Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 01-31-2013, 11:49 PM
 
45,582 posts, read 27,196,139 times
Reputation: 23898

Advertisements

Obama Closing Air Defense System on U.S./Mexico Border: America More Vulnerable to Low Altitude Attack

On January 17th, 2013, Exelis Systems Corporation sent out an email (see email below) to all of its employees informing them that on March 15th, 2013 all TARS Air Defense Mission Operations will permanently cease. These TARS Air Defense sites were under the control of the United States Air Force. On January 15th, 2013, the Air Force informed Exelis (the defense contractor running the TARS sites) that the TARS sites will be shut down. Exelis tried to then negotiate with the Department of Homeland Security to see if they would take over the vital project, but it seems as though those negotiations have failed. What does this mean?

This means the southern border of the United States of America will be more vulnerable to attack from low flying aircraft, low altitude missiles, and other infiltrations such as smuggling.



History of the program is here... TETHERED AEROSTAT RADAR SYSTEM

They used this system originally for drug trafficking - although it can also be used for security and military purposes in detecting any hostile low flying aircraft or missiles within a 200 nautical mile range.


Liberals say they want to cut defense - here you go. Now we are more vulnerable since no plans are mentioned to replace the service the TARS system performed.

I would rather cut out the $1.5 billion annual gift to Egypt before I cut the TARS system.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 01-31-2013, 11:54 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,215,209 times
Reputation: 18824
Outlived its usefulness. Not needed any longer. There's one of these stations less than a few miles from my house.

I've heard for a few years that it would be on the chopping block. Nothing new.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-01-2013, 12:43 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,870,209 times
Reputation: 10371
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRob4JC View Post
Obama Closing Air Defense System on U.S./Mexico Border: America More Vulnerable to Low Altitude Attack

On January 17th, 2013, Exelis Systems Corporation sent out an email (see email below) to all of its employees informing them that on March 15th, 2013 all TARS Air Defense Mission Operations will permanently cease. These TARS Air Defense sites were under the control of the United States Air Force. On January 15th, 2013, the Air Force informed Exelis (the defense contractor running the TARS sites) that the TARS sites will be shut down. Exelis tried to then negotiate with the Department of Homeland Security to see if they would take over the vital project, but it seems as though those negotiations have failed. What does this mean?

This means the southern border of the United States of America will be more vulnerable to attack from low flying aircraft, low altitude missiles, and other infiltrations such as smuggling.



History of the program is here... TETHERED AEROSTAT RADAR SYSTEM

They used this system originally for drug trafficking - although it can also be used for security and military purposes in detecting any hostile low flying aircraft or missiles within a 200 nautical mile range.


Liberals say they want to cut defense - here you go. Now we are more vulnerable since no plans are mentioned to replace the service the TARS system performed.

I would rather cut out the $1.5 billion annual gift to Egypt before I cut the TARS system.
If America wants to be less vulnerable then it should bring it's troops home. That is the reason they attack us.
Stop the war on drugs. It is costly and inefficient, it isn't working and it unfairly penalizes minorities.

How hard is that to figure out?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:

Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top