Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-18-2012, 03:34 PM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,378,354 times
Reputation: 3050

Advertisements

I say it is time to BOYCOTT these companies until they quit poisoning us without our knowledge!


Coca-Cola said Friday it will lower levels of a chemical in caramel coloring to comply with a California law, but insisted the beverage’s recipe will not change and poses no health risks.

Pepsi is making similar changes in order to avoid having to label products with a cancer warning due to what California has ruled are high levels of 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI), shown to cause cancer in lab animals, consumer advocates said.
Coke and Pepsi Drop Cancer-Causing Chemical For California, Rest of the World Still Drinking It | AlterNet







http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-0...roup-says.html




.

Last edited by Miborn; 03-18-2012 at 03:38 PM.. Reason: add
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-18-2012, 03:36 PM
 
Location: Houston, TX
2,239 posts, read 3,216,684 times
Reputation: 1180
You would have to drink over 1000 cans a day of Coke/Pepsi for any real harm. No one drinks that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 03:39 PM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,378,354 times
Reputation: 3050
Quote:
Originally Posted by NYer75 View Post
You would have to drink over 1000 cans a day of Coke/Pepsi for any real harm. No one drinks that.
And where is your link?
And if that were the case why lower the amount? They did not want to have to put a warning label on the product
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 05:20 PM
 
1,067 posts, read 1,746,474 times
Reputation: 452
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
I say it is time to BOYCOTT these companies until they quit poisoning us without our knowledge!


Coca-Cola said Friday it will lower levels of a chemical in caramel coloring to comply with a California law, but insisted the beverage’s recipe will not change and poses no health risks.

Pepsi is making similar changes in order to avoid having to label products with a cancer warning due to what California has ruled are high levels of 4-methylimidazole (4-MEI), shown to cause cancer in lab animals, consumer advocates said.
Coke and Pepsi Drop Cancer-Causing Chemical For California, Rest of the World Still Drinking It | AlterNet







FDA Skeptical Chemical in Sodas Harm Consumers - Bloomberg




.
Yeah, it rots your teeth too. Still no cavities.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 05:23 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,774,907 times
Reputation: 6435
Dude, grab a frosty beverage and chill.

I'd Like to Buy the World a Coke Commercial - 1971 - YouTube
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 06:23 PM
 
12,669 posts, read 20,378,354 times
Reputation: 3050
If anyone of you that have posted flippant posts you would not think it so funny if you have lost friends and family to cancer.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 06:25 PM
 
Location: Michigan
5,376 posts, read 5,324,260 times
Reputation: 1633
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
And where is your link?
And if that were the case why lower the amount? They did not want to have to put a warning label on the product
From your linked article

"The ABA added that a person would need to drink massive amounts of cola to reach a risk level similar to the dosing in mice — 2,900 cans of cola every day for 70 years — upon which California based its decision".
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 06:29 PM
 
Location: Georgia, on the Florida line, right above Tallahassee
10,471 posts, read 15,774,907 times
Reputation: 6435
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miborn View Post
If anyone of you that have posted flippant posts you would not think it so funny if you have lost friends and family to cancer.
I lost my cousin to Cancer. He was 17. If Coke was going to kill us all, why have lifespans increased so much when it's been drank for decades.
Obvioiusly, Coke is good for people.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 06:29 PM
 
Location: San Diego, CA
10,582 posts, read 9,739,309 times
Reputation: 4172
Here ya go....

This "Center for Science and Public Interest" bunch is the same group that announced that Saccharin causes cancer, too. And it turned out that Saccharin was even more "deadly" than this caramel coloring. You only had to drink 765 cans of soda a day, to reach the threshold where it might hurt you.

These junk-science scare groups are some of the sillier institutions in the country. They completely ignore dosages, and also fail to notice that people who have drunk Coke or Pepsi all their lives have NO more cancer history that those who never touch the stuff.

But common sense does not further their agenda of getting government to clamp down on everything and everyone over anything... so they possess none.

---------------------------------

Coke, Pepsi Skirt Cancer Warning Label - ABC News

Mar 9, 2012 11:00am


Coke, Pepsi Skirt Cancer Warning Label






Beverage powerhouses PepsiCo and Coca-Cola will modify the caramel coloring in their sodas to avoid a cancer warning label that a new California law requires when drinks contain a certain amount of carcinogens.

The state of California added ammonia sulfite, or 4-MI, to its list of known carcinogens last year. Along with the state list, a consumer group known as the Center for Science in the Public Interest claimed a chemical in the sodas’ coloring is linked to cancer in animals and exceeds allowable levels in U.S. food supply.

The FDA told Reuters a person would have to drink 1,000 cans of soda every single day to hit the threshold risk of animals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-18-2012, 06:33 PM
 
Location: in a cabin overlooking the mountains
3,078 posts, read 4,357,839 times
Reputation: 2275
Who is forcing you to drink soda anyway?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top