Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech
It amazes me that in such a short post there can be so many fallacies.
|
I'm going to agree with much you have to say here.
Quote:
1. "Greeniacs" -- actually, those that are for a greener planet don't like E85 or E15, which siphons off corn that should be used for food, to automobile consumption.
|
In general I believe this is true. Most of the hard core would prefer electric.
Quote:
2. The " Marxist idiot in the white house" that you refer must have been George W. Bush, since it was his Administration that ushered in ethanol to be added to gasoline, to appease the corn lobby.
|
Once again, true. Not that this is an excuse to continue the failed idea.
Quote:
3. The Washington Examiner piece uses extensive quotes from the American Petroleum Institute. Do we really think they are an objective unbiased source? Seems to me that they are as objective about adding ethanol to gasoline as the tobacco lobby is about linking cigarettes to cancer.
|
Mybe so but they are right here.
Quote:
Snopes basicly debunks the OP's claims. 'According to Snopes, the EPA recommends that E15 should only be used in cars designed for Flex Fuels' and the Snopes piece says that the claims the OP is making is overblown.
|
I have to call a foul here. Snopes does not say it's overblown, it says that proponents of E15 says it's overblown. Would that be like asking the tobacco industry about cigarettes and cancer?
Also, by stating overblown not even the proponents are willing to say it's simply not true.