Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-07-2013, 12:33 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,892 posts, read 16,077,572 times
Reputation: 3954

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
McCain didn't engage in a cover-up, now did he???
Actually, since Obama has released his birth certificate twice, and McCain has never released his at all, perhaps you want to reconsider your ideas on who is or is not covering anything up.

Just sayin'.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-07-2013, 12:34 PM
 
Location: Virginia Beach
8,346 posts, read 7,044,020 times
Reputation: 2874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
McCain didn't engage in a cover-up, now did he???
Off topic, considering that Obama didn't engage in one either.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 12:35 PM
 
26,569 posts, read 14,444,771 times
Reputation: 7431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
McCain didn't engage in a cover-up, now did he???
no, he didn't. do you believe there is a cover-up concerning obama's birth and/or eligibility?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 12:48 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,463,404 times
Reputation: 8599
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi
McCain didn't engage in a cover-up, now did he???
Yes, he did. And it was such a brilliant cover-up that no one suspects McCain was really born in the USSR to 2 commie agents as part of Stalin's master-plan.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 12:49 PM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,496,025 times
Reputation: 1406
If you read Hollander v. McCain you will understand why there is no citizenship standing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 01:27 PM
 
46,951 posts, read 25,990,037 times
Reputation: 29442
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
McCain didn't engage in a cover-up, now did he???
If it was a successful cover-up, how would we know?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 03:46 PM
 
7,214 posts, read 9,393,969 times
Reputation: 7803
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robin Rossi View Post
This is what passes for DemocRAT debate.
There is no need for debate with the same subhuman knuckle dragging mouth breathers that keep bringing up this same tired and endlessly debunked garbage over and over again. They are not real Americans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 03:59 PM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,763 times
Reputation: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dane_in_LA View Post
If it was a successful cover-up, how would we know?
It may be difficult to PROVE a negative, but one hidden by a forgery requires no further "proof" than adverse inference from the cover-up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 04:18 PM
 
2,836 posts, read 3,496,025 times
Reputation: 1406
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape View Post
It may be difficult to PROVE a negative, but one hidden by a forgery requires no further "proof" than adverse inference from the cover-up.
It is axiomatic that the proof (or disproof) of an asserted fact cannot be made negative inference; i.e., the absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. Likewise, a presumption (e.g., that something that cannot be seen does not exist) is not evidence, much less proof of the fact. In law, there are statutory presumptions that, when established, have the effect of an asserted fact. For example, most jurisdictions have ‘‘missing persons’’ statutes that establish the legal presumption that a person reported missing for a period of time is presumed dead. However the presumption is not proof that the missing person is in fact dead; and many a "presumed" dead man has returned to find his wife married to his friend and his property sold to his neighbor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-07-2013, 04:23 PM
 
Location: Tampa Florida
22,229 posts, read 17,855,263 times
Reputation: 4585
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape View Post
It may be difficult to PROVE a negative, but one hidden by a forgery requires no further "proof" than adverse inference from the cover-up.
Well, I know I won't vote for him again!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:42 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top