Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:22 AM
 
68 posts, read 51,090 times
Reputation: 24

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Asheville1 View Post
Due Process is guaranteed by the Constitution. No matter Dorner's actions or state of mind, he was entitled to Due Process under the United States Constitution.

I am astounded and ashamed how many American's continue to surrender their rights. There will be a eventual backlash to this, and then it will be too late.

Fools.
If he wanted due process, why didn't he surrender?

I'd like to know exactly what you propose the authorities should have done in this situation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:27 AM
 
4,267 posts, read 6,180,716 times
Reputation: 3579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sepsis View Post
Did they have a duty to do so? Besides, Dorner was murdering cops up to the end, so the idea that he was going to surrender is a specious one, and the idea that he was no longer a threat is an even more specious idea.

The LAPD wasn't there. San Bernardino County Sheriff's fired the incendiary tear gas canister in after regular tear gas failed to remove Dorner from the cabin.

The lengths cop haters will go to defend a murderer like Dorner is quite impressive (but also a little scary).
LAPD swat team was there. Police Audio From Dorner Siege:

Quote:
More than seven agencies, federal, state and local were involved in the final hours of the siege. The LAPD SWAT Team was airlifted in to carry out the final raid, with reports later confirming, “the SWAT team had the cabin surrounded.”
I am not defending Dorner. What he did was very wrong. I am however not OK with police shooting first and asking questions later like they did when they shot at 3 innocent people who they were lucky to not have been killed. I also think that they should not have burned down the cabin. What do you think they meant when they were heard yelling "burn the mother ****** down"? If Dorner had hostages, they would have burned right along side of him. The police have a responsibility to avoid putting the public in danger in their pursuit of criminals.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:28 AM
 
4,267 posts, read 6,180,716 times
Reputation: 3579
Quote:
Originally Posted by trlhiker View Post
Why should they? He never made any attempt to turn himself in, he stated that he would not be taken alive, and why should they risk anyone else being killed by this heavily armed killer? He got exactly what he deserved.
The police should not have risked innocent people's lives in their reckless pursuit of Dorner. Remember the three innocent people they shot at?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:29 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,032,019 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
again, the burning could have been done by Dorner himself.
Just to be devil's advocate, the let it burn remark could be just what is stated. Let's say the fire wasn't started by the police, but instead felt no desire, once started, for it to be put out. Frankly from what I've seen and heard in the past from cops, that would be far more inline with the events. Does it put the cops in a better light, not in my estimation but it seems to me to be a more realistic alternative.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:29 AM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,268,742 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Asheville1 View Post
Due Process is guaranteed by the Constitution. No matter Dorner's actions or state of mind, he was entitled to Due Process under the United States Constitution.
yes he was allowed Due Process. If he didn't act like a the violent coward he was, he would have gotten that due process.

no, he wanted to die, which is why he ran away like the coward he was, and hid. If he wanted due process, he would have turned himself in. If he wanted due process, he wouldn't have killed anyone at all.

This man wasn't looking for due process. he was looking to die, and he was hoping that the cops would kill him.

When a person shoots at anyone, Due process goes out the window and SAFETY for others comes into play. If that person can be apprehended without harm, then the due process kicks in.

Dorner was not interested at all in that. He wanted to die.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:30 AM
 
4,267 posts, read 6,180,716 times
Reputation: 3579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
again, the burning could have been done by Dorner himself.

It could have happened when they heard the gun shot after a tear gas canister was shot into/toward the cabin (the most likely cause of the fire).

If you think they deliberately set fire to a cabin, you are as deluded as the rest of the posters who think the same.

When I hear the police in the background of the scanner repeatedly yelling, "Burn the mother****** down!" over and over again and then the cabin goes up in flames, yes, I am going to think that they intentionally burned it down. Who wouldn't believe that?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:30 AM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,268,742 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dorthy View Post
The police should not have risked innocent people's lives in their reckless pursuit of Dorner. Remember the three innocent people they shot at?
so the police should let Dorner run around killing cops instead?

Sorry, but this was a madman who killed an innocent couple who had nothing to do with the police at all. He was a danger to the community.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:31 AM
 
68 posts, read 51,090 times
Reputation: 24
Well, all police officers in the state of California have law enforcement authority within the entire state, so... who knows, maybe they were in fact the most capable SWAT team in the region, Big Bear is only 80 miles from L.A. Or maybe it was professional courtesy.

Did they say that? I'm sure they meant it, after all, mostly San Bernardino Sheriffs there, and Dorner had just murdered one, and critically wounded another - so I suspect no one was particularly torn up at the prospect of Dorner choosing to burn to death rather than surrender.

Come on now, let's not be delusional - we all know that Dorner was not going to voluntarily surrender himself.

As for shooting at the civilians - yep, stupid moves by nervous people - however, the city of L.A will be paying a lot in damages for that.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:33 AM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,268,742 times
Reputation: 1837
Quote:
Originally Posted by ovcatto View Post
Just to be devil's advocate, the let it burn remark could be just what is stated.
From an unknown source, not confirmed as coming from any police entity. We don't know if that the recording is from the LAPD, the San Bernarndino sherrifs or police, the fire fighters on scene, or a fake transmission put out by conspiracy theory mongers.

Quote:
Let's say the fire wasn't started by the police, but instead felt no desire, once started, for it to be put out.
Yes, approach a burning building with a holed up man with a known arsenal. Did the police or fire fighters know that Dorner wouldn't be shooting at them while they tried to put the fire out?

Criminals do stupid things, and its been known that people have shot at fire fighters when they tried to put fires out. don't know why, but maybe its to hide another crime, or the evidence of arson.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-14-2013, 10:33 AM
 
4,267 posts, read 6,180,716 times
Reputation: 3579
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arus View Post
so the police should let Dorner run around killing cops instead?

Sorry, but this was a madman who killed an innocent couple who had nothing to do with the police at all. He was a danger to the community.
They should have cautiously pulled over the suspects that turned out not to be Dorner rather then shooting at innocent people. Dorner killing innocent people does not give police license to do the same thing.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:40 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top