Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
The Wall Street Journal has reported that most of the staff at Benghazi were CIA operatives.
What were they doing?
The Libyan government had recently been overthrown. Libya produces a particularly valuable "sweet crude" oil. The American government would be interested in what factions were seizing power in the turmoil left after Gaddafi was overthrown, and having CIA operatives on the ground to gather that intelligence would be a priority, I would think. Moreover, doing anything to support American interests at that crucial time would also be a reason to have CIA operatives on the ground in Libya. And having a location to put together that information, for operatives to share information with one another, to compare notes, to figure out puzzling information, to transmit or store information so that it could be transferred to the United States would be necessary, I would think.
I dont care how many questions the repubs ask....they will never, ever, NEVER, EVER be staisfied with the answers given.....never, never, never, never, never, never, ever
Of course we will. Libs have no clue how much the truth matters.
[MOD CUT/off topic] He couldn't care less about Benghazi and dead ambassadors.
How many of their names have the administration turned over to the Senate questioners? Why none, at all that I know about. Now I don't know what Kos says about this but it would be untrue if you knew.
Obama says that the Senators are running out of questions and Graham says that he has asked about 30 and used piles of paper repeating them to the White House with no answers. When will people realize that the questions they are running out of are the ones he refuses to answer.
I saw the video live the other day but know that few Fox watchers are here so I offer all the chance to see what Graham said in the interview. Obama either tells the story or someday will be proved a liar. Of course, he thinks the media letting him have a pass will win out and I don't believe it will, in the end.
How about they dont make public the names of these people, but let the Senate question them? Somehow, Im sure you liberals and Obama would be against that too.
But seeing how you dont give a damn about Obama's inaction and failure to do anything the night of the attack, it wouldnt matter to you what would come out of questioning anyone else. You just dont give a damn. Your party, your messiah, your agenda is a lot more important to you than anything else.
What Republicans can't wait to pull another Valerie Plame?
And what would that be? Are you referring to the employee who worked at the CIA?
You know, the one a dem, Fitzpatrick, was supposed to find out who "outed" her when he knew right from the start it was Richard Armitige who first uttered her name and ole fitz kept right on running his which hunt and in the end CHARGED NO ONE.
Obama is hiding the identities of the Benghazi survivors from the Senate.
Quote:
Originally Posted by roysoldboy
How many of their names have the administration turned over to the Senate questioners? Why none, at all that I know about. Now I don't know what Kos says about this but it would be untrue if you knew.
Obama says that the Senators are running out of questions and Graham says that he has asked about 30 and used piles of paper repeating them to the White House with no answers. When will people realize that the questions they are running out of are the ones he refuses to answer.
I saw the video live the other day but know that few Fox watchers are here so I offer all the chance to see what Graham said in the interview. Obama either tells the story or someday will be proved a liar. Of course, he thinks the media letting him have a pass will win out and I don't believe it will, in the end.
And what would that be? Are you referring to the employee who worked at the CIA?
You know, the one a dem, Fitzpatrick, was supposed to find out who "outed" her when he knew right from the start it was Richard Armitige who first uttered her name and ole fitz kept right on running his which hunt and in the end CHARGED NO ONE.
Is this the Valerie Plame you are referring to?
If I'm not mistaken, didn't CNN Crossfire anchor Bob Novak have something to do with the outing of her?
WE dont need to know their names but surely, the Senate should be able to ask them questions.
The Senate knows why the names will not be released. The questions have nothing to do with Bengazi.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Obama is hiding the identities of the Benghazi survivors from the Senate.
