Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
So are Alabama and Mississippi interested in the safety of women? Seems like each state is using a different method to defeat Roe vs Wade by making sure they create regulations that clinics can't possibly pass.
Quote:
The Alabama House on Thursday passed legislation that would stiffen the requirements for abortion clinics in the state that opponents say would force most to close.
.................................................. ............
Supporters of the legislation said the rules would ensure the safety of women who have abortions.
The bill now goes to the Senate for debate.
In Mississippi, the state's lone abortion clinic might be forced to close because of stricter rules put in place by the Legislature and wholeheartedly endorsed by the governor.
More women die from abuse from their husbands/boyfriends because they got pregnant
More women die from the pregnancy itself
More women die from heart attacks
More women die from cancer
All of the above contribute more to women's death, than the side effects of an abortion.
So are Alabama and Mississippi interested in the safety of women? Seems like each state is using a different method to defeat Roe vs Wade by making sure they create regulations that clinics can't possibly pass.
Of course they're interested in the safety of women.
It's just liberal nonsense to say that if you're pro-life then you don't care about the safety of women.
We don't make cocaine legal so that it's safer to buy it. That's just flat out stupid.
So yes they are interested in the safety of women and are interested in making abortions harder to get. There's no conflict between those two.
If you want to argue that they shouldn't make abortions harder to come by, then do so. But to ask if they care about the safety of women is an intellectually dishonest question. Abortion on demand has nothing to do with safety. Even the most ardent prolifers generally accept abortion in the case of the mother's safety.
Status:
"everybody getting reported now.."
(set 17 days ago)
Location: Pine Grove,AL
29,550 posts, read 16,528,077 times
Reputation: 6031
Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2
If you want to argue that they shouldn't make abortions harder to come by, then do so. But to ask if they care about the safety of women is an intellectually dishonest question. Abortion on demand has nothing to do with safety. Even the most ardent prolifers generally accept abortion in the case of the mother's safety.
There is no such thing as an abortion on demand, Also,I have met pro lifers who are against abortions of all kinds.
More women die from abuse from their husbands/boyfriends because they got pregnant
More women die from the pregnancy itself
More women die from heart attacks
More women die from cancer
All of the above contribute more to women's death, than the side effects of an abortion.
NO woman should die from the side effects of abortion. Listing other bad things does not make it any better.
There is no such thing as an abortion on demand, Also,I have met pro lifers who are against abortions of all kinds.
Have you heard Gov. Como speak lately? Will make the hair on your head stand on end. Abortion on demand for any reason and done by anyone in the medical field, even nurses.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.