Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-21-2013, 06:26 AM
 
Location: New York (liberal cesspool)
918 posts, read 816,882 times
Reputation: 222

Advertisements

Quote:
Researchers have discovered a stunning new process that takes the energy from coal without burning it -- and removes virtually all of the pollution.
The clean coal technique was developed by scientists at The Ohio State University, with just $5 million in funding from the federal government, and took 15 years to achieve.
“We’ve been working on this for more than a decade,” Liang-Shih Fan, a chemical engineer and director of OSU’s Clean Coal Research Laboratory, told FoxNews.com, calling it a new energy conversion process. “We found a way to release the heat from coal without burning.”
The process removes 99 percent of the pollution from coal, which some scientists link to global warming. Coal-burning power plants produced about one-third of the nation’s carbon dioxide total in 2010, or about 2.3 billion metric tons, according to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
Read more: Coal: the cleanest energy source there is? | Fox News

This could put a crimp in Obozo's plan for America. A new discovery that advances, in a positive manner, the "trickle-down" benefits of our capitalist system. The Oval Office does not now have a happy camper in the driver's seat! If this process were patented, rights to use the process could be sold to other countries and I can see our debt-load starting to dwindle. A source that, in and of itself, also nullifies a new energy source in America from criticism by the "global warming" and "carbon" lobby critics and enviro-wacko contingent. And as a side bonus it will make Bad AlGorithms' phony trading in "carbon credits", which only works by placing a value on pollution to encourage trading in units of it, an unwise investment. Let's call this the "Anti-Rahm" strategy. The taking advantage of using a crisis to develop a POSITIVE solution. Works for me as a right-wing agenda!

I'm definitely likin' the potential for this new discovery. Good to see FoxNews, our only major "Fair and Balanced" news source, out front on this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-21-2013, 09:50 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by doctorhugo View Post
This could put a crimp in Obozo's plan for America. A new discovery that advances, in a positive manner, the "trickle-down" benefits of our capitalist system.
WASHINGTON, D.C.— As part of President Obama’s all-of-the-above approach to American energy, the Energy Department announced that nine universities have won awards for research projects that will continue to support innovation and development of clean coal technologies.


“Advancing the development of clean coal technologies is an important part of President Obama’s strategy to develop every source of American energy and ensure the United States leads the world in the global clean energy race and continues to take advantage of domestic resources here at home,” said U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu. “These university research projects will help build on extensive progressive made by this Administration to promote innovative technologies that help make coal-fired energy cleaner and more cost-competitive, while training the next generation of scientists and engineers in cutting-edge clean coal technologies.”
Obama Administration Announces Clean Coal Research Awards for Universities Across the Country | Department of Energy

You were saying?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 09:52 AM
 
Location: In a Galaxy far, far away called Germany
4,300 posts, read 4,408,318 times
Reputation: 2394
I'm all for it!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 10:14 AM
 
20,716 posts, read 19,360,295 times
Reputation: 8283
So why don't people like this show up on the Forbes wealthiest people list, speaking of the right wing meritocracy that is spoken so highly about?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 10:16 AM
 
9,408 posts, read 11,931,036 times
Reputation: 12440
Cleaner than wind and solar?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 10:17 AM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,763 times
Reputation: 178
Solid fuel for thought, man.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 10:18 AM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,763 times
Reputation: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by 11thHour View Post
Cleaner than wind and solar?
Wind is polluted, and solar is radioactive and causes melanin with people of certain genetic dispositions.

Last edited by Statutory Ape; 02-21-2013 at 10:32 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 10:25 AM
 
Location: Portland, Oregon
46,001 posts, read 35,176,592 times
Reputation: 7875
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape View Post
Wind is polluted, and solar is radioactive and causes melanin.
Both are passive sources of energy, the only reason the air is polluted is due to humans polluting it. But that doesn't change the fact that both produce constant energy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 10:31 AM
 
1,596 posts, read 1,158,763 times
Reputation: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Both are passive sources of energy, the only reason the air is polluted is due to humans polluting it. But that doesn't change the fact that both produce constant energy.
Pacifist energy is expensive energy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-21-2013, 10:34 AM
 
31,387 posts, read 37,045,063 times
Reputation: 15038
Quote:
Originally Posted by Statutory Ape View Post
Pacifist energy is expensive energy.
Due largely to the lack of economies of scale.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:27 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top