Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:00 PM
 
Location: Texas
38,859 posts, read 25,535,277 times
Reputation: 24780

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by kidkaos2 View Post
Signing into law a bill restricting 1st amendment freedoms is a crazy nonreason.
It is when it didn't happen. Check out the many posts in this very thread.

Quote:
Funny how when Bush signed a law that Democrats didn't like it wasn't "hate Bush for some crazy nonreaseon"

Funny how when Bush started and then stupidly mismanaged two dumb wars and then crashed the economy some folks objected.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:01 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,109,663 times
Reputation: 8527
...sigh...




An executive order that goes against the consitution.




You buried the needle again.
To quote Vice President Biden: "That's a load of malarky."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:02 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,209,760 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1AngryTaxPayer View Post
You've never been in a gym with an Olympic set have you.
I'm not fat, I"m big boned.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:03 PM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,253,192 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
It is not an Executive Order.
H.R. 347 is an Act passed by Congress.
You'd think defenders of The Constitution would know the difference.

snopes.com: HR 347 - Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:03 PM
 
Location: North America
19,784 posts, read 15,109,663 times
Reputation: 8527
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Draper View Post
I'm not fat, I"m big boned.

Cartman, is that you???
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:05 PM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,253,192 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by urbanlife78 View Post
Well talk about a thread fail, does the OP even know anything about politics?
Perhaps he's trying to fill roysoldboy's shoes. You know, pick up the mantle left by roy's departure.

A daily "hate everything Obama" thread, regardless of how stupid it is.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:07 PM
 
Location: The Cascade Foothills
10,942 posts, read 10,253,192 times
Reputation: 6476
Quote:
Originally Posted by DeadSpeak View Post
I'm 8'2 400lbs, with long blonde hair and bright blue eyes. My father is Zeus and I am thor fear my hammer mortal. You know it's true because I post it on a forum !
lol
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:08 PM
 
6,331 posts, read 5,209,760 times
Reputation: 1640
Quote:
Originally Posted by katzpaw View Post
It is not an Executive Order.
H.R. 347 is an Act passed by Congress.
You'd think defenders of The Constitution would know the difference.

snopes.com: HR 347 - Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act
End of thread
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:37 PM
 
Location: Stasis
15,823 posts, read 12,463,404 times
Reputation: 8599
This is a 1971 law with just a slight change in text.

The old law made it a federal offense to "willfully and knowingly" enter restricted buildings or grounds, now the law only specifies that one must "knowingly" enter such a space to be in violation of the law.
The updated version specifically defines the phrase "restricted buildings or grounds" to include "the White House or its grounds, or the Vice President's official residence or its grounds.
"

The act was passed in the Senate by unanimous consent and approved by the House of Representatives by a lopsided vote of 399-3.

snopes.com: HR 347 - Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 02-26-2013, 12:43 PM
 
Location: New Jersey
12,755 posts, read 9,646,362 times
Reputation: 13169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cinebar View Post
Perhaps he's trying to fill roysoldboy's shoes. You know, pick up the mantle left by roy's departure.

A daily "hate everything Obama" thread, regardless of how stupid it is.
OMG, what happend to roy? Did he move to Becki-beckistan?
I just realized I haven't been prodded into watching a video in a couple of days!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:32 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top