Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-03-2013, 10:32 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720

Advertisements

They are not loopholes. They are laws in the tax code.
If they were put there incorrectly or by mistake then Congress and the IRS have had years to "fix them" but they haven't.

They are not illegal and not cheating. They are there for any taxpayer to take, given their level of income.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-03-2013, 10:36 AM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,260,372 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
Beg pardon? I quoted from the link I provided in my post directly, word for word. How is that a misquote, and where exactly is the error in my numbers?
You cut off the sentence right before the explanation was given. The 7% global rate was particularly low and not the norm. Their effective rate was 29% in 2011.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
You misquoted what the document said. Their effective tax rate was low due to capital losses from the financial crisis.

"Williams also pointed to a company press release, from April 17, on taxes paid by GE. According to that release, GE paid an effective global tax rate of 7 percent in 2010, counting money paid “to the IRS and foreign counterparts” in other nations. That rate was particularly low, Williams said, because the company lost $32 billion in its financial business during the global financial crisis.
According to the company release, GE’s effective tax rate jumped to 29 percent in 2011. The company paid $2.9 billion in worldwide corporate income tax in 2011, and another $1 billion in other U.S. taxes that year, the release states."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 10:39 AM
 
Location: Great State of Texas
86,052 posts, read 84,472,986 times
Reputation: 27720
That $32 billion in losses was NOT mentioned by the MSM when they went on their rampage of corporations that pay no taxes.

That, my friends, is propaganda. These outlets know that Americans won't dig any further than the article at hand.
The government knows that Americans won't dig any further than the sentences being spoken to them.

Apathy is going to destroy us from within.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 10:40 AM
 
Location: The Brat Stop
8,347 posts, read 7,239,563 times
Reputation: 2279
Quote:
How many corporations pay NO federal taxes??
Approximately 280.

Study: Many corporations pay no income taxes - Nov. 3, 2011

Thirty companies paid no U.S. income tax 2008-2010: report | Reuters
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 10:41 AM
 
Location: NC
1,873 posts, read 2,407,080 times
Reputation: 1825
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
You cut off the sentence right before the explanation was given. The 7% global rate was particularly low and not the norm. Their effective rate was 29% in 2011.
Nonsense, here's the link again for all to see General Electric paid $2.67 billion, not zero, in 2010 income taxes | The Daily Caller.

I don't have any interest in GE per se, but what were their revenues, net income and US taxes in 2010 then?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 10:43 AM
 
Location: NC
1,873 posts, read 2,407,080 times
Reputation: 1825
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
They are not loopholes. They are laws in the tax code.
If they were put there incorrectly or by mistake then Congress and the IRS have had years to "fix them" but they haven't.

They are not illegal and not cheating. They are there for any taxpayer to take, given their level of income.
Agreed...that's why I included (unfortuately legal) in my post. If they were cheating, the IRS or DOJ would be all over it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 10:49 AM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,260,372 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
Nonsense, here's the link again for all to see General Electric paid $2.67 billion, not zero, in 2010 income taxes | The Daily Caller.

I don't have any interest in GE per se, but what were their revenues, net income and US taxes in 2010 then?
You would need their tax return for that year to determine that, but tax returns are private. You do realize that most companies posted losses from 2009, right? They paid about $1Billion is US taxes in 2010 and about a 7% global rate. In 2011 they paid an effective rate of 29% and $3.9 billion.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 10:58 AM
 
Location: NC
1,873 posts, read 2,407,080 times
Reputation: 1825
Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
You would need their tax return for that year to determine that, but tax returns are private. You do realize that most companies posted losses from 2009, right? They paid about $1Billion is US taxes in 2010 and about a 7% global rate.
I don't know that, but it's possible right after the meltdown, do you have a source?

Another statement on GE 2010 "We expect to have a small U.S. income tax liability for 2010," GE chief spokesman Gary Sheffer told us. How big is small? GE declined to say. The number is unlikely to ever be disclosed unless GE goes public with it, or is forced to do so." http://features.blogs.fortune.cnn.co....rEhpDxq7.dpuf

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679
In 2011 they paid an effective rate of 29% and $3.9 billion.
As for 2011, we'll never know as you've noted in an earlier post. Another reference "The best figure we do have for what GE pays in taxes comes from its financial statements and it's something called "cash taxes paid." In 2011, that figure was $2.9 billion. Compare it to the $20 billion GE made in 2011 before taxes and that works out to a rate of 14.4%. But that's for all of GE's taxes everywhere. GE won't say how much of that money was for local or federal U.S. taxes or to foreign governments, to which GE appears to pay the majority of its taxes these days. What's more, some of that money could have been for back taxes. And some could eventually be refunded." What GE paid in taxes in 2011: Who knows? - The Term Sheet: Fortune's deals blogTerm Sheet
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 11:46 AM
 
11,768 posts, read 10,260,372 times
Reputation: 3444
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
I don't know that, but it's possible right after the meltdown, do you have a source?

Another statement on GE 2010 "We expect to have a small U.S. income tax liability for 2010," GE chief spokesman Gary Sheffer told us. How big is small? GE declined to say. The number is unlikely to ever be disclosed unless GE goes public with it, or is forced to do so." The truth about GE's tax bill - Fortune Features

As for 2011, we'll never know as you've noted in an earlier post. Another reference "The best figure we do have for what GE pays in taxes comes from its financial statements and it's something called "cash taxes paid." In 2011, that figure was $2.9 billion. Compare it to the $20 billion GE made in 2011 before taxes and that works out to a rate of 14.4%. But that's for all of GE's taxes everywhere. GE won't say how much of that money was for local or federal U.S. taxes or to foreign governments, to which GE appears to pay the majority of its taxes these days. What's more, some of that money could have been for back taxes. And some could eventually be refunded." What GE paid in taxes in 2011: Who knows? - The Term Sheet: Fortune's deals blogTerm Sheet
Well, the source was the factcheck website. As I have already stated financial accounting and tax accounting are two very different things. Tax accounting generally uses a cash basis and financial uses GAAP. You can show a financial profit and not owe any tax, likewise you can show a loss and owe tax. Whatever writer tried to come up with a 14.4% tax rate has never taken intermediate accounting. Any accounting or even finance student can tell you there is a difference between the accounting methods. G.E. doesn't break down their taxes by country so we will probably never know the exact dollar amount paid in 2010. Maybe G.E. will release their tax returns, but they aren't required to.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lycos679 View Post
You misquoted what the document said. Their effective tax rate was low due to capital losses from the financial crisis.

"Williams also pointed to a company press release, from April 17, on taxes paid by GE. According to that release, GE paid an effective global tax rate of 7 percent in 2010, counting money paid “to the IRS and foreign counterparts” in other nations. That rate was particularly low, Williams said, because the company lost $32 billion in its financial business during the global financial crisis.
According to the company release, GE’s effective tax rate jumped to 29 percent in 2011. The company paid $2.9 billion in worldwide corporate income tax in 2011, and another $1 billion in other U.S. taxes that year, the release states."
Quote:
Originally Posted by HappyTexan View Post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-03-2013, 11:47 AM
 
79,907 posts, read 44,191,640 times
Reputation: 17209
Quote:
Originally Posted by Midpack View Post
Wow, betrayed by your own link, which says "GE paid an effective global tax rate of 7 percent in 2010, counting money paid “to the IRS and foreign counterparts” in other nations." I think the OP was talking about US federal taxes, don't you?

And if you spend 30 seconds on Google you find:
"Additionally, a document GE provided to TheDC establishes that the company paid $2.671 billion globally in income tax in 2010" - suggesting GE paid US taxes of 2.6%. Seems a little low to me.

Continuing:
"GE did pay taxes in 2010, in fact it paid $1 billion in U.S. taxes that year, including federal income taxes,” company spokesman Andrew Williams told TheDC. He later clarified that the $1 billion number included “all state, local and federal taxes in the U.S.” - so the 2.6% they paid included all state, local and federal taxes. Who knows how much they paid in US federal taxes, they won't say...

General Electric paid $2.67 billion, not zero, in 2010 income taxes | The Daily Caller

They are a public company after all, so you're welcome to wade through their annual report to see if you can find their US federal taxes paid http://www.ge.com/ar2010/pdf/GE_AR10_Financials.pdf
Shouldn't our jobs czar get some sort of break for all the hard work he put in creating all these new jobs?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top