Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Sometime between 5:30-6:00 p.m., when the student was about to leave the bus, he spotted the suspect holding the dark colored gun on his lap.
"Are you going to shoot me?," he asked, according to the report.
The teen struck the suspect in the head and other students wrestled the gun away.
One parent says the students who helped disarm the suspect have been suspended. The school won't comment on that.
"The student says he wrestled the .22 caliber RG-14 Revolver away from the suspect, a football player, who witnesses say threatened toshoot a teammate because he had been arguing with his friend.
According to the mother, the school suspended her son because he refused to cooperate in the investigation. She says he was scared.
Despite the fact the suspect pointed a load gun at another student and threatened to shoot authorities charged him with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon "without intent" to kill."
That's messed up. I wonder why the kid refused to cooperate. It's pretty standard to be suspended when you are involved in any kind of fight, but this doesn't make sense. I'm also wondering why the football player isn't getting charged with intent to kill when he specifically threatened to shoot.
Sounds like the student was suspended by gun grabbers because they wanted a mass shooting to push their agenda. That is what you get for bucking the system in today's backwards world where the kid should be hailed as a hero. Instead he's punished. He should have blown a whistle or called 911 according to the idiots.
The liberals don't want students to defend their schools.
They prefer that the kids huddle under desks, let the shooter kill 13-20 of them, and wait for the cops to arrive 15 minutes later with body bags and to clean up all the blood.
"The student says he wrestled the .22 caliber RG-14 Revolver away from the suspect, a football player, who witnesses say threatened toshoot a teammate because he had been arguing with his friend.
According to the mother, the school suspended her son because he refused to cooperate in the investigation. She says he was scared.
Despite the fact the suspect pointed a load gun at another student and threatened to shoot authorities charged him with aggravated assault with a deadly weapon "without intent" to kill."
That's messed up. I wonder why the kid refused to cooperate. It's pretty standard to be suspended when you are involved in any kind of fight, but this doesn't make sense. I'm also wondering why the football player isn't getting charged with intent to kill when he specifically threatened to shoot.
Because snitches get stitches.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
