Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-04-2013, 08:27 AM
 
Location: Texas
37,949 posts, read 17,865,154 times
Reputation: 10371

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Considering that the poster thinks that a 1,039 fold increase is 1,039,000% you might as well ask them to flap their arms fast enough to fly as understand the underlying methodology.

Most of the posters around here are too biased or too uneducated to do anything more than regurgitate partisan garbage.

What I find bizarre is the demonization of these CEO's that run major corporations while we idolize singers and athletes and generally pay them a whole lot more than a typical CEO.
Agreed. I can tell you the type of job that is worth a ton of money. Whatever job I'm doing at the time.
Why should anyone decide for others, in the private sector, what the maximum someone can earn should be?
It's good to be King.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-04-2013, 08:34 AM
 
41,813 posts, read 51,051,710 times
Reputation: 17864
Quote:
Originally Posted by ellemint View Post
Because it leads to wealth inequality which is a problem.
Back in the 70's my parents made a pretty decent living and getting a color TV that was about 27 inches was a pretty big deal. The problem with your comparison is the standard of living has risen across the board.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2013, 09:38 PM
 
20,335 posts, read 19,925,039 times
Reputation: 13442
Quote:
Originally Posted by thecoalman View Post
Back in the 70's my parents made a pretty decent living and getting a color TV that was about 27 inches was a pretty big deal. The problem with your comparison is the standard of living has risen across the board.
Good point. Back in 1977 I paid $500.00 for a new 25" color TV.

And no remote or stereo sound.

F'n thing weigh a ton.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2013, 09:42 PM
 
Location: Pinal County, Arizona
25,100 posts, read 39,261,360 times
Reputation: 4937
Sounds like employee jealousy to me.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2013, 09:43 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,650,086 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathguy View Post
Considering that the poster thinks that a 1,039 fold increase is 1,039,000% you might as well ask them to flap their arms fast enough to fly as understand the underlying methodology.

Most of the posters around here are too biased or too uneducated to do anything more than regurgitate partisan garbage.

What I find bizarre is the demonization of these CEO's that run major corporations while we idolize singers and athletes and generally pay them a whole lot more than a typical CEO.
Yes, that was a mistake, added one zero too many. But at least I'm not a condescending goon.

There are far fewer high-paid celebrities than there are high-paid corporate CEOs.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2013, 09:47 PM
 
10,553 posts, read 9,650,086 times
Reputation: 4784
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loveshiscountry View Post
Agreed. I can tell you the type of job that is worth a ton of money. Whatever job I'm doing at the time.
Why should anyone decide for others, in the private sector, what the maximum someone can earn should be?
It's good to be King.
It' a problem because it would be far better to have 100 workers in a corporation each be making $1000 more than to have an additional $100,000 go to a CEO. The 100 workers are likely to spend that extra money on consumer goods like food, housing, automobiles. A wealthy CEO will invest it, which does not add much to economic growth.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-04-2013, 11:27 PM
 
Location: CO/UT/AZ/NM Catch me if you can!
6,927 posts, read 6,937,246 times
Reputation: 16509
Quote:
Originally Posted by 01Snake View Post
Give us a call when you want to compare apples to apples.
Hey! I never once mentioned William Tell!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2013, 02:07 PM
 
Location: Old Town Alexandria
14,492 posts, read 26,594,973 times
Reputation: 8971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Colorado Rambler View Post
I'm half Swiss and I can tell you that the Swiss, including their executives, aren't especially interested in moving to the US. Switzerland has a higher standard of living than the US, its economy is more stable, their health care system is better, and the only homeless are a few druggies that used to hang out in one of Zurich's city parks, and these days I think most of them have moved to the Nederlands. The quality of life alone would top any amount of money a US corporation might offer.
I dont blame them. Didnt Tina Turner recently apply for citizenship. Wish I had her money, Id move in a second.

QOL in Switzerland has got to be significantly better than the US. I have never seen so many homeless since we lived in Ft Lauderdale. US is looking third world lately.

At least theres justice for the citizens in Switzerland.

Last edited by dreamofmonterey; 03-13-2013 at 02:43 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-13-2013, 02:34 PM
 
56,988 posts, read 35,198,461 times
Reputation: 18824
Interesting.

Swiss execs will be fine. They aren't going anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:10 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top