Doctor accused of severing babies' spines with scissors in 'house of horrors' (religion, children)
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Its not disturbing. Its your constant abuse of painting the entire pro-choice movement by the actions of this one heinous doctor.
don't even play innocent, because that's what you are doing.
you've been told throughout this thread that both sides of the spectrum have found this doctor to be inhuman and deserve to be incarcerated. We can follow the news. We don't need your sources twist on spreading lies and misinformation.
Use a different news source where its more objective than the bias sites you shill for.
Don't shoot the messerger. If you want to post links you are free to do so.
You asked for reasons everything should not be done to save the fetus......I gave you a reason why many times they aren't.
Sometimes hideous deformities are not discovered until late in the pregnancy. Deformities so severe that there is no chance of life longer than a few horribly agonizing, torturous hours.
What is the point of brining these hideously deformed fetuses into the world only to struggle and suffer in vain for a few hours or days?
Why put the fetus or the mother through that? What is the point....other than to give a few zealots a righteous thrill?
So instead lets put the mother through a 3 day abortion, rip the baby apart limb from limb and in Gosnell's case snip the spine after the baby lays there alive for a few hours. Some of his staff even played with the baby for awhile, they were so cute. Disgusting. Someone is getting thrills but it's not the religious people who are trying to stop it.
Why aren't pro-lifers demanding dental clinics be subjected to stricter inspections?
Why aren't pro-lifers demanding that this be covered on the evening news 24/7, day after day after day?
Is it because this only involves the health and well being of actual living, breathing people, including children?
Oh wait! Maybe a pregnant woman had dental work done and her fetus became infected!
You pro-lifers better get on this.....pronto!
Maybe there is a vast conspiracy among dentists to keep this story quiet?
The real reason for no uproar? Your ultimate agenda isn't to ban dentistry.....so there is no reason for keeping this story in the headlines, is there?
It is just another story that WAS reported.....and the dentist IS being prosecuted and there are other stories making the headlines instead. A healthcare provider broke the law and is being prosecuted for doing so.....just like Gosnell.
End of these stories.....cue up the coverage on the Korean dictator threating to drop bombs, the Boston bombings and the Texas explosions....that is how media coverage works.
People won't tune in for old news......the Gosnell story is old news, just like the story on the dentist....that is just the way it is.....learn to live with it.
If dentists all over the country were dong this on a regular basis I can assure people there would be an uproar about it. This was an isolated case, you are becoming silly in your analogies now just to protect any and all abortions.
Gosnell IS NOT OLD NEWS not when he is on trial right now and we are going to find out the "rest of the story."
But Jacobson isn’t alone. Kate Michelman, former president of NARAL, complained in a piece blaming pro-lifers for Gosnell that the very state hosting his “House of Horrors,” as it’s now known, Pennsylvania, had enacted “volumes of costly regulations… designed to regulate abortion care right out of existence.”
This makes no sense. Gosnell would have been one of the abortion clinics regulated out of existence had state agencies or the National Abortion Federation bothered.
Don’t these people want that?
Once in Gosnell’s absence, Cross saw a large baby delivered into the toilet. She saw his little arms and legs moving in a swimming motion as he struggled to get out of the toilet bowl. Cross held her hands 12-16 inches apart to demonstrate to the jury how big the baby was. Adrienne Moton, who was the first worker to testify for the prosecution, snipped the baby’s neck in front of the mother while she sat bleeding into the toilet. Moton then took the body away and put it into a container.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Abortion Backers Oppose Regulations That Could Have Stopped Gosnell
