Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-19-2013, 01:04 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,769,934 times
Reputation: 6856

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Considering that those three programs consume around 60% of the total federal budget, it makes sense to cut those entitlements since they are unsustainable. The fourth largest consumer of the federal budget is Defense spending, and that should also be cut by a like amount. The fifth biggest chunk of the federal budget goes to pay for the interest on the National Debt. Obviously that is one item that cannot be reduced, at least until we start paying off the National Debt.

Combined, MediCare/MedicAid, Social Security, and Defense spending constitute over 75% of the federal budget. By "cut" I do not mean reducing the overall growth, I mean an actual reduction in spending. Not over a 10 year period, but within the same session of Congress.
Would you consider allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices as a cut in spending?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-19-2013, 02:11 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,450,574 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
Would you consider allowing Medicare to negotiate drug prices as a cut in spending?
Absolutely not. This is what has been causing health insurance prices to skyrocket in the first place. MediCare pays doctors pennies on the dollar for services rendered, therefore the cost is past on to the consumer. 90% of the doctors will not touch MediCare patients in Alaska, and I do not blame them.

By allowing the government to pay less than the market value for drugs, once again it will be the consumer who picks up the portion not paid by the government. If not for MediCare/MedicAid, insurance premiums and doctor bills would be much more reasonable today. Government is the primary cause for the skyrocketing health care costs, and ObamaCare will make it ten times worse than it already is today.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 02:20 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,769,934 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Absolutely not. This is what has been causing health insurance prices to skyrocket in the first place. MediCare pays doctors pennies on the dollar for services rendered, therefore the cost is past on to the consumer. 90% of the doctors will not touch MediCare patients in Alaska, and I do not blame them.

By allowing the government to pay less than the market value for drugs, once again it will be the consumer who picks up the portion not paid by the government. If not for MediCare/MedicAid, insurance premiums and doctor bills would be much more reasonable today. Government is the primary cause for the skyrocketing health care costs, and ObamaCare will make it ten times worse than it already is today.
So you don't support saving $156 billion over ten years?

Medicare would negotiate drug prices under Dem bill - The Hill's Healthwatch
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 02:26 PM
 
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
17,823 posts, read 23,450,574 times
Reputation: 6541
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
So you don't support saving $156 billion over ten years?

Medicare would negotiate drug prices under Dem bill - The Hill's Healthwatch
Not on the backs of doctors, their patients, and the rest of the health care industry. MediCare/MedicAid should never have existed at the federal level in the first place. The best thing for the nation would be to abolish them completely. Let the States decide whether or not they wish to subsidize people's health care, that is not the place for the federal government.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 08:35 PM
 
13,900 posts, read 9,769,934 times
Reputation: 6856
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glitch View Post
Not on the backs of doctors, their patients, and the rest of the health care industry. MediCare/MedicAid should never have existed at the federal level in the first place. The best thing for the nation would be to abolish them completely. Let the States decide whether or not they wish to subsidize people's health care, that is not the place for the federal government.
You can always opt out of Medicare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 08:38 PM
 
1,520 posts, read 1,873,536 times
Reputation: 545
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
I came across a townhall column written by Dan Holler. He's basically saying that the GOP should avoid a grand bargain that greatly reduces the deficit because it would help Obama politically. What happened to country before party?

GOP
The Democrats should avoid any "grand bargain" that cuts Social Security or Medicare.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-19-2013, 10:32 PM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,906,557 times
Reputation: 3497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winter_Sucks View Post
I came across a townhall column written by Dan Holler. He's basically saying that the GOP should avoid a grand bargain that greatly reduces the deficit because it would help Obama politically. What happened to country before party?

GOP
The GOP has always been politics first and country last. That's why they spent most of the last four years deliberately trying to make the economy worse and refusing to pass anything which would actually help the economy.

Oh, well, at least they spent all of their time passing dozens and dozens of bills to stripe women of their rights and get between a woman and her doctor, right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:12 PM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top