Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2013, 10:27 PM
 
Location: Where they serve real ale.
7,242 posts, read 7,906,557 times
Reputation: 3497

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by All American NYC View Post
At least it would help control spending which Obama refuses to do.
Blatantly unconstitutional as only the federal government may issue or approve currency. This is by morons for morons. Gold has absolutely no intrinsic value and you might as well use sea shells. It just goes to show how many gullible idiots there are on the far right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2013, 10:29 PM
 
Location: somewhere in the woods
16,880 posts, read 15,198,564 times
Reputation: 5240
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
Blatantly unconstitutional as only the federal government may issue or approve currency. This is by morons for morons. Gold has absolutely no intrinsic value and you might as well use sea shells. It just goes to show how many gullible idiots there are on the far right.

sigh, not the federal government, congress.

I look at this this way, people will still be able to use dollars, but they would also be able to use gold and silver. most gold and silver coins in the USA is still US currency.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2013, 05:02 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by monkeywrenching View Post
sigh, not the federal government, congress.

I look at this this way, people will still be able to use dollars, but they would also be able to use gold and silver. most gold and silver coins in the USA is still US currency.
Congressmen don't ruN the printing presses nor stamp coins.

Nobody is going to use a gold coin that has $20 embedded on it to buy $20 worth of goods because that coin has a numismatic value far higher.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2013, 05:05 AM
 
Location: Mille Fin
408 posts, read 607,471 times
Reputation: 472
I can't believe the good people of AZ actually pay their representatives to horseplay around and essentially troll the president like this. What childish behaviour... I'd be fuming if I was a citizen of that state. All this time wasted on some pseudo-slapstick comedy. And some folks applaud this?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2013, 07:47 AM
 
Location: SE Arizona - FINALLY! :D
20,460 posts, read 26,330,678 times
Reputation: 7627
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonarchist View Post
It would play out with the clerk weighing the dust, paying the customers license tax with the clerks own paper money, whilst pocketing the gold.
Why don't you give that a try and let us know how it ACTUALLY "plays out".


Ken
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2013, 07:54 AM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,038 posts, read 2,513,553 times
Reputation: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by MTAtech View Post
Let me wrap my head around this thread. The OP calls himself "All American NYC," has been an absolutist when defending the constitution when it's the 2nd Amendment but now thinks it's absolutely ok to violate the follwoing specific section of the constitution:

Of course, the plan is not at all practical. An once of gold fluctuates at around $1,500/oz. That means that a $10 coin would be 1/150 of an once or about the size of a be-be and change value as the market changes.
The Constitution prohibits state government from making their own money. Not the private sector.

All Arizona is dooing is saying they will accept private money.

Nothing unconstiutional at all about it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2013, 07:55 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nonarchist
It would play out with the clerk weighing the dust, paying the customers license tax with the clerks own paper money, whilst pocketing the gold.
Let me understand this, when I go to the grocery store, instead of handing the clerk money or a credit card, they're expected to weigh gold dust using the current COMEX price for gold and tax the correct amount of payment? I could comment further but why bother?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2013, 07:57 AM
 
Location: Columbus, OH
3,038 posts, read 2,513,553 times
Reputation: 831
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
Blatantly unconstitutional as only the federal government may issue or approve currency. This is by morons for morons. Gold has absolutely no intrinsic value and you might as well use sea shells. It just goes to show how many gullible idiots there are on the far right.
The Constitution does not forbid the private coining of money.

Gold has value and has for the last 5,000 years or so.

Your post just goes to show how moronic and gullible some people are.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2013, 07:58 AM
 
Location: The Republic of Texas
78,863 posts, read 46,624,265 times
Reputation: 18521
Quote:
Originally Posted by Think4Yourself View Post
Blatantly unconstitutional as only the federal government may issue or approve currency. This is by morons for morons. Gold has absolutely no intrinsic value and you might as well use sea shells. It just goes to show how many gullible idiots there are on the far right.


Businesses make their own currency daily. It is more obvious in retail.
It is called a coupon.

States can issue currency, that is only accepted in their state.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-22-2013, 07:59 AM
 
Location: Long Island, NY
19,792 posts, read 13,948,900 times
Reputation: 5661
Quote:
Originally Posted by OhioRules View Post
The Constitution prohibits state government from making their own money. Not the private sector.

All Arizona is dooing is saying they will accept private money.

Nothing unconstiutional at all about it.
I guess Arizona can accept shiny rocks as payment for state taxes, if it wants, but it cannot establish shiny rocks as a uniform tender.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:52 AM.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top