Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
Reply Start New Thread
 
Old 03-21-2013, 02:38 PM
 
7,541 posts, read 6,254,170 times
Reputation: 1837

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by TheMoreYouKnow View Post
That's true, Ted Cruz has never made any effort to hide anything about his background or where he was born.
Neither has Obama. Or did you miss the entire autobiography he authored?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 03-21-2013, 02:50 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,434,116 times
Reputation: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisFromChicago View Post

2 ) Naturalization Act of 1790 "The Act also establishes the United States citizenship of children of citizens, born abroad, without the need for naturalization: "the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens"


...
The Naturalization Act of 1790 Was repealed 5 years later.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 02:53 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,893 posts, read 16,031,963 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
this is what started some of the stupid birthers stuff
How could it have started anything having anything to do with birthism when the birthers were off and running by March of 2008, and Breitbart didn't discover this biography until more than four years later?

More generally, why does birthism so often require a time machine?

Birthism becan in the early morning of March 1, 2008 on the right-wing blog Free Republic.

This is the historical fact.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 02:56 PM
 
4,739 posts, read 4,419,951 times
Reputation: 2485
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
The Naturalization Act of 1790 Was repealed 5 years later.
and replaced with the 1795 act. .

SO seriously. . .show the source if you think you need both parents to be americans.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 02:58 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,893 posts, read 16,031,963 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
The Naturalization Act of 1790 Was repealed 5 years later.
No it was not. It was never repealed.

It was replaced.

The difference is massive.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 03:03 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,434,116 times
Reputation: 356
[quote=HistorianDude;28773059]


Even the Framers of the COnstitution would disagree. I refer you to the Naturalization Act of 1790 where they say different.


[quote]
And the children of citizens [PLURAL!]of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens" – Naturalization Act 1790.

If you go by that, Ted Cruz is not a natural born Citizen. He was born in a foreign sovereignty to a foreign father.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 03:14 PM
 
4,739 posts, read 4,419,951 times
Reputation: 2485
Quote:


Even the Framers of the COnstitution would disagree. I refer you to the Naturalization Act of 1790 where they say different.

And the children of citizens [PLURAL!]of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens" – Naturalization Act 1790.

If you go by that, Ted Cruz is not a natural born Citizen. He was born in a foreign sovereignty to a foreign father.

Well. . ."And the children of citizens of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens"


1) I think your reaching: well i'm not the gramar police but children of citizen of the united states doesn't work, because there are multiple citizens. So isn't it saying that all citizens and not refering to a mom/dad relationship. Citizens of the united states (US) not (mom and dad)


2) This is an act. Was expanded in 1795. I take it to imply that ANY one born from a US Citizen would be natural-born. Regardless - the consitution beats acts. If Cruz goes to court . . .the ACT could get ruled unconsitutional OR the court could go with citizens refers to multiple citizen so therefore its consitiunal

Until there is a case. . .you really don't know what will happen in the courts for sure. I just don't see a lot of evidence that this issue will be a problem for Cruz. I think no one would put money behind him if they didn't think they were prepared to fight/win that battle.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 03:30 PM
 
1,523 posts, read 1,434,116 times
Reputation: 356
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisFromChicago View Post

1)So isn't it saying that all citizens and not refering to a mom/dad relationship. Citizens of the united states (US) not (mom and dad)
.
No it is not saying that. Here is what Representative John Bingham, the father of the 14th Amendment, said on the House floor:


“Every human being born within the jurisdiction of the United States of parents not owing allegiance to any foreign sovereignty is, in the language of your Constitution itself, a natural born citizen.” (Cong. Globe, 39th, 1st Sess., 1291 (1866))


Again, Cruz was born not within the jurisdiction of the United States. Also his father owed allegiance to a foreign sovereignty, namely Cuba. He doesn't meet the traditional standard of being a Constitutional Article 2 Section 1 natural born Citizen that the presidential clause calls for. On the other hand, Obama doesn't either despite being born in the U.S.. His British National father also owed allegiance to a foreign sovereignty, the United Kingdom. The British Act of 1948 governed his birth status.

From Obama's own campaign website in 2008:

"When Barack Obama Jr. was born on Aug. 4,1961, in Honolulu, Kenya was a British colony, still part of the United Kingdom’s dwindling empire. As a Kenyan native, Barack Obama Sr. was a British subject whose citizenship status was governed by The British Nationality Act of 1948. That same act governed the status of Obama Sr.‘s children.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 03:47 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,893 posts, read 16,031,963 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
No it is not saying that. Here is what Representative John Bingham, the father of the 14th Amendment, said on the House floor:
Gong!

John Bingham had exactly nothing to do with the citizenship clause of the 14th Amendment.

Every time you lead that quotation (which also is not about the 14th Amendment at all) by labeling him as "the father of the 14th Amendment" you are trying to deceive your readers into thinking it is an authoritative statement on the meaning of the 14th's citizenship clause.

And of course... that would be a lie.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 03-21-2013, 03:53 PM
 
Location: Littleton, CO
20,893 posts, read 16,031,963 times
Reputation: 3954
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Army Soldier View Post
“And the children of citizens [PLURAL!]of the United States that may be born beyond Sea, or out of the limits of the United States, shall be considered as natural born Citizens" – Naturalization Act 1790.

If you go by that, Ted Cruz is not a natural born Citizen. He was born in a foreign sovereignty to a foreign father.
Wrong. [MOD CUT/insulta] The plural was required because the Congress was passing a law for more than one person. Amazing, huh?



Cruz is the child [SINGULAR] of a citizen [SINGULAR] of the United States born out of the limits of the United States. Therefore he is one of the children [PLURAL] of citizens [PLURAL] of the United States born out of the limits of the United States that the Framers considered as natural born citizen.

Last edited by Ibginnie; 03-21-2013 at 04:55 PM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top