Welcome to City-Data.com Forum!
U.S. CitiesCity-Data Forum Index
Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
 [Register]
Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
View detailed profile (Advanced) or search
site with Google Custom Search

Search Forums  (Advanced)
 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:08 AM
 
3,599 posts, read 6,761,459 times
Reputation: 1461

Advertisements

Quote:
Originally Posted by squarian View Post
No, it does not. Why is 2-3% of AGI "no contribution"? I assume by the phrase "no contribution", you mean the ordinary sense of the phrase in standard English?
In almost all social countries. Those families making 30k are still required to pay much more than 2%.

You cannot fully fund a system without these people contributing more than 2%.

The money doesn't appear out of no where. The math doesn't add up to pay for the system if those making 30k only contribute 2-3%.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:13 AM
 
4,684 posts, read 4,553,841 times
Reputation: 1588
Quote:
Originally Posted by aneftp View Post
In almost all social countries. Those families making 30k are still required to pay much more than 2%.

You cannot fully fund a system without these people contributing more than 2%.

The money doesn't appear out of no where. The math doesn't add up to pay for the system if those making 30k only contribute 2-3%.
So I take it you have now revised your view, and accept that 2-3% of AGI is in fact a contribution, contrary to what you said previously. However, your contention is that, while it is a contribution, it is an insufficient contribution, and in your view these low-earning people should pay more.

What then is your recommendation? How much of their income should the poor pay for health insurance?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:24 AM
 
14,249 posts, read 17,853,061 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by aneftp View Post
In almost all social countries. Those families making 30k are still required to pay much more than 2%.

You cannot fully fund a system without these people contributing more than 2%.

The money doesn't appear out of no where. The math doesn't add up to pay for the system if those making 30k only contribute 2-3%.
In the UK, the NHS is funded from National Insurance contributions (which also cover old age pensions - similar to social security). The employee rate is 12% and the employer rate is 13.8%. There is a lower and upper threshold where contributions are not due:

HM Revenue & Customs: National Insurance Contributions
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:24 AM
 
8,584 posts, read 9,060,078 times
Reputation: 5890
Quote:
Originally Posted by key4lp View Post
Bottom line: the US health industry is a big business. Again: read the Time magazine report from March 4,
2013 "Bitter Pill Why Medical Bills Are Killing Us." "For every member of Congress there are more than
7 lobbyists working for various parts of the health care industry." One example are the "chargemasters"
who assign prices to everything (hospitals) & affects our country's medical crisis. They "factor in not
only direct costs but also allocate expenses such as overhead, capital expenses, executive salaries,
insurance, differences in regional costs of living and more. The stories and examples of grossly
overcharges for medications, supplies, blood tests etc... and how these charges are distributed,
paid and defended should be a wake up call.
Some posts may be very lucky, wealthy or have amazing insurance....but how long will your luck
last?
As a worker who has worked and paid taxes nearly 40 years, my luck ran out 7 years ago when my working wife became ill. And that was the end of a good run not using our insurance. When it was needed it failed us in quick order. Allowing us to fall between the cracks that opened wide and swallowed both of us, both the sick and the non-sick.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:31 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,363,612 times
Reputation: 9616
hmmm.....""""free""""??????

not to the taxpayer

singlepayer...would cost 3 to 6 trillion in the USA to cover the 320 million people...depending on the EXTENT of the coverage (ie 3 trillion for a 80/20 policy with many things not covered...or 6 trillion with a 100% (medicaid type) coverage minus cosmetic)

we have 120 million tax FILERS
of those 120 million tax FILERS nearly 50% dont have a positive tax liability (pay taxes)

3 trillion divided by (the full filers) 120 million is 25k
6 trillion divided by 120 million is 50k

3 trillion divided by 65 million (high estimeate of actual tax payers) is 46k
6 trillion divided by 65 million is 90k

can the average tax payer afford 25k - 90k in taxes ANNUALLY????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:35 AM
 
7,300 posts, read 6,702,487 times
Reputation: 2915
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
hmmm.....""""free""""??????

not to the taxpayer

singlepayer...would cost 3 to 6 trillion in the USA to cover the 320 million people...depending on the EXTENT of the coverage (ie 3 trillion for a 80/20 policy with many things not covered...or 6 trillion with a 100% (medicaid type) coverage minus cosmetic)

we have 120 million tax FILERS
of those 120 million tax FILERS nearly 50% dont have a positive tax liability (pay taxes)

3 trillion divided by (the full filers) 120 million is 25k
6 trillion divided by 120 million is 50k

3 trillion divided by 65 million (high estimeate of actual tax payers) is 46k
6 trillion divided by 65 million is 90k

can the average tax payer afford 25k - 90k in taxes ANNUALLY????
Canadians are laughing at this.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:39 AM
 
Location: Long Island
32,816 posts, read 19,363,612 times
Reputation: 9616
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saritaschihuahua View Post
Canadians are laughing at this.
canadians laugh at math????
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:42 AM
 
7,300 posts, read 6,702,487 times
Reputation: 2915
Quote:
Originally Posted by workingclasshero View Post
canadians laugh at math????
No. Canadians all have excellent healthcare, and due to that, they can read right through American right wing anti-health care propaganda BS far better than people in the U.S,. who have never been further than their local 7-11.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:45 AM
 
Location: Whoville....
25,386 posts, read 35,407,229 times
Reputation: 14692
Quote:
Originally Posted by chielgirl View Post
A) Show me where that happens;
B) You have to wait in the US, and they may not pay your bills when it's over.

WhooHooo...you only have to wait 4.1 weeks after your cancer diagnosis to start treatment... I have two friends whose dh's are battling cancer right now. Treatment started the next day. Phone calls were made that day.

Waiting Your Turn: Wait Times for Health Care in Canada, 2012 Report | Fraser Institute

"There is also a great deal of variation in the total waiting time faced by patients across the provinces. While Ontario reports the shortest total wait in 2012 (14.9 weeks); New Brunswick reports the longest at 35.1 weeks. The same is true of variation among specialties. Patients wait longest between a GP referral and orthopaedic surgery (39.6 weeks), while those waiting for medical oncology begin treatment in 4.1 weeks."

My only experience with Candaian health care is a couple of decades old. One women in my lamaze class was coming from Canada to have her baby in the US because she waited until she was pregnant to find an OB/GYN and couldn't get an appointment until after her baby would be born. Dh had a friend who came across the border to have open heart surgery here (paid cash) because he was given 6 months to live and put on a 12 month wait list for surgery. He chose life at his own expense. I understand wait times are better now.

My doctor also left Canada to practice medicin here in the 1990's. I understand the migration has slowed or stopped since then. My guess is the recession and slow recovery here have something to do with that.

Here's a graph for those who prefer pictures:
http://www.usnews.com/opinion/blogs/...merican-system

Last edited by Ivorytickler; 04-03-2013 at 10:00 AM..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
Old 04-03-2013, 09:46 AM
 
14,249 posts, read 17,853,061 times
Reputation: 13807
Quote:
Originally Posted by Saritaschihuahua View Post
Canadians are laughing at this.
So is everyone else in the developed world.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.

Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.


Reply
Please update this thread with any new information or opinions. This open thread is still read by thousands of people, so we encourage all additional points of view.

Quick Reply
Message:


Over $104,000 in prizes was already given out to active posters on our forum and additional giveaways are planned!

Go Back   City-Data Forum > General Forums > Politics and Other Controversies
Similar Threads

All times are GMT -6.

© 2005-2024, Advameg, Inc. · Please obey Forum Rules · Terms of Use and Privacy Policy · Bug Bounty

City-Data.com - Contact Us - Archive 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37 - Top