Get Out The Popcorn: Obama Eligibility Appeal Case Winds Up In Alabama Supreme Court With Established Birther Judges (Barack Hussein Obama, March)

[jwm1964]

Originally Posted by EmeraldCityWanderer

It's kind of funny when the only way birthers have a chance in hell of having a case is to have biased judges that have already convinced themselves of the verdict of the case before anything is presented. A violation of the law and every standard of ethical behavior in the legal system. It just shows how disgusting birthers have become in their descent into insanity.

Acknowledging authenticity of the claims equals "convinced themselves of the verdict"?
An accusation of bias by someone who can't even identify those s/he disagrees with without insulting them (birthers, crazy, etc.) much less discuss the topic rationally?

I would think those who support Obama would like to see this issue raised, reviewed and resolved once and for all. The reluctance to provide documentation and the atmosphere of obfuscation, especially from an administration that ran on the premise of transparency only add credibility to the accusation.

[Old Army Soldier]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

LOL... even Orly Taitz isn't buying it...

My experience with Judge Roy Moore in AL and Judge James Bell in MS | Dr. Orly Taitz, Esquire

That's just Orly trying to steal the spotlight and interject her flawed opinions about the Justice. You can't believe anything she says. Now if you will excuse me. It's 9:50 and I have to get ready for church. I'm late.

[HeyJude514]

Originally Posted by jwm1964

I would think those who support Obama would like to see this issue raised, reviewed and resolved once and for all.

This issue was raised, reviewed and resolved...and then it was raised, reviewed and resolved again...and then it was raised, reviewed and resolved yet again, over and over and over and over. Just because you don't get the answer you want to hear doesn't mean that the answer hasn't been provided.

[jwm1964]

Originally Posted by HistorianDude

The issue has been raised 202 times. It has been reviewed (counting appeals) more than three hundred times. It has been resolved "once and for all" (i.e. decided on the merits) 13 times.

You'd think those who don't support Obama might have noticed.

And it has not been resolved.
Only hidden under more obfuscation and lies.

I suppose you consider Benghazi a Right Wing Conspiracy.
Government trafficking of firearms in Mexico as well as the Middle East a blatant lie promoted by anti-Obama factions.

[Weichert]

HistorianDude, I do agree. West Point generally produces outstanding officers. I met several who were among the best.

But sometimes a bad one would get thru the system and, like Moore, were disasters.

[HistorianDude]

Originally Posted by jwm1964

And it has not been resolved.

Yes. It has. You might have noticed we had a second inauguration just a couple of months ago.

Originally Posted by jwm1964

I suppose you consider Benghazi a Right Wing Conspiracy.

Not at all. I consider it a right-wing witch-hunt.

That said, it has nothing to do with whether or not this issue has been resolved.

Originally Posted by jwm1964

Government trafficking of firearms in Mexico as well as the Middle East a blatant lie promoted by anti-Obama factions.

That's not even a complete sentence.

And again, it has nothing to do with whether or not this issue has been resolved.

Time for your Ritalin I think.

[Nonarchist]

Originally Posted by HeyJude514

Birfer logic: Until I get the answer that I want, it will not be resolved.

Fraud is a many de-splendored thing.

[Old Gringo]

Originally Posted by GhostOfTheReich

Hopefully we can finally get this fraud out of office...I would be happy with just declaring his presidency null and void and that includes anything he signed into law.

You're in for years of unhappiness.

Pity.

[Nonarchist]

Only way to undo Monsanto is to undo the fraud that made it king of kings.

[EmeraldCityWanderer]

Originally Posted by jwm1964

Acknowledging authenticity of the claims equals "convinced themselves of the verdict"?
An accusation of bias by someone who can't even identify those s/he disagrees with without insulting them (birthers, crazy, etc.) much less discuss the topic rationally?

I would think those who support Obama would like to see this issue raised, reviewed and resolved once and for all. The reluctance to provide documentation and the atmosphere of obfuscation, especially from an administration that ran on the premise of transparency only add credibility to the accusation.

From the judge "Moore said he’s seen no convincing evidence that Obama is a “natural born citizen” and a lot of evidence that suggests he is not." Besides the hundreds of court cases that differ. He ignores any evidence that disagrees and is convinced of Obama's guilt...it is not the sign of a sane mind.

The definition of a Birther is some one who refuses to acknowledge president Obama is not eligible to be president of the US based on the circumstance of his birth, even after 300 failed challenges and released documents. If you are doing something that when pointed out to you is insulting and disgraceful, maybe the better idea is to stop doing it instead of complain it was pointed out. There is no rational justification for this over the last 3 years...just lie after lie that is disproved time and time again.

So far for every piece of documentation provided it is ignored and a new conspiracy arises. Providing the birth certificate didn't work, birth announcements, long form certificate, court case after case...nothing is enough. When the standards of evidence can never be met no matter what is shown then it's a sign of psychosis. If that is insulting and makes people look stupid, as well as crazy, then stop doing it.