Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
It is 2009, Sanctions did not work. Iran is one month from having the bomb Sould we attack or let them have it?
Please reply yes or no
i love my country of usa.
i was born here. but we have a nasty habit of doing deterrent initiative strikes. (that means get them b4 they get us).
stephen s
san diego ca
Iran having a nuclear bomb would be bad, but I don't think it would be worse than what our attacking them would entail. Preempitve strikes would further radicalize the populations of Islamic countries and make attacks on US troops & Israel more frequent, increasing terrorism as well. It could also destabilize Iraq further.
Maybe we should start to worry about Pakistan that has the bomb today, instead of Iran that may have it in 10 years. Lots of radical USA hating jihadists that live there.
This is such a no-brainer. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad has a nuclear bomb. Yes, we totally innialate Iran. Gone. Poof! Better them than us. And this guy is crazier than a bedbug and would bomb us if he could. Why wait around and test him?
It is 2009, Sanctions did not work. Iran is one month from having the bomb Sould we attack or let them have it?
Please reply yes or no
It is 2007, we have a moron as president and our economy is one month away from bombing. Should we attack the White House or let the Iranians have him?.
Please reply yes or yes.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.