Please register to participate in our discussions with 2 million other members - it's free and quick! Some forums can only be seen by registered members. After you create your account, you'll be able to customize options and access all our 15,000 new posts/day with fewer ads.
Hence the use of the words "should" and "allegedly" in my OP.
Okay, so let's start over...
"SHOULD Clinton be required to register as a sex offender over ALLEGED crimes, not including his infidelity which I merely included as background information?" No, nobody can or should be required to register over something for which they have never been charged and/or convicted. And while we're at it, prior behavior or sexual histories have never been considered in courts.
You asked "should Bill Clinton have to register as a sex offender for life," and then listed infidelity among his "crimes." Did I misunderstand the OP?
See my post.
It's a crime for soldiers. Bubba was CiC (boss of soldiers).
There has been a rash of thread lately that claim that President Bush and Vice President Cheney are guilty of war crimes. The same partisanship behind such nonsense is also responsible for people on the left asserting that the charges against Clinton are not proven, and that he should be considered innocent until proven guilty. The same partisan hacks want to hang Bush and Cheney. Do you see how this works?
You know, you really should look at state statutes in re sex offenses before you take the world of an anonymous person on an internet forum. He's wrong.
It's a crime for soldiers. Bubba was CiC (boss of soldiers).
I don't know how military law works - was he considered a soldier during his Presidency? If so, then maybe you should write to the military and request he be treated as one.
There has been a rash of thread lately that claim that President Bush and Vice President Cheney are guilty of war crimes. The same partisanship behind such nonsense is also responsible for people on the left asserting that the charges against Clinton are not proven, and that he should be considered innocent until proven guilty. The same partisan hacks want to hang Bush and Cheney. Do you see how this works?
Tone down the rhetoric.
Extreme wishful thinking on your part. It's how libs roll.
There has been a rash of thread lately that claim that President Bush and Vice President Cheney are guilty of war crimes. The same partisanship behind such nonsense is also responsible for people on the left asserting that the charges against Clinton are not proven, and that he should be considered innocent until proven guilty. The same partisan hacks want to hang Bush and Cheney. Do you see how this works?
Tone down the rhetoric.
Fail, nothing to do with this thread. None of us here have said anything about war crimes. Anyone who claims they are guilty of war crimes are wrong, and claiming Bill is a sex offender is also wrong. Don't point to other's fallacies to justify your own.
And since you're moving the goalposts on us, I'm guessing we're done here?
In WHAT state has this happened that you are aware of.... I don't think that is the law in California, or anywhere else. There is a very specific set of criteria regarding being classified as a sex offender and having to register as a sex offender....set out in the laws.
Just curious, why did you specifically mention California, out of 49 other possible states? That makes no sense.
Please register to post and access all features of our very popular forum. It is free and quick. Over $68,000 in prizes has already been given out to active posters on our forum. Additional giveaways are planned.
Detailed information about all U.S. cities, counties, and zip codes on our site: City-data.com.